Get emailed when this bill changes status, is amended, or advances.
Disclaimer: This page provides general informational summaries only and does not constitute legal advice. AI-generated content may contain errors. Always consult a qualified attorney for guidance specific to your situation.
Read full disclaimer →
SB 1159 excludes AI and nonhuman entities from being considered 'persons' under specific California laws, ensuring these laws apply only to human entities.
SB 1159 clarifies that artificial intelligence and similar nonhuman entities are not included in the definitions of 'person' under several California laws, impacting their interaction with public access and governance measures.
Key Provisions
Excludes AI systems and nonhuman entities from the definition of 'person' under the California Public Records Act.
Clarifies that AI is not a 'member of the public' under the Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act and the Ralph M. Brown Act.
Excludes AI from being considered a 'person' under the Political Reform Act of 1974, the Administrative Procedure Act, and CEQA.
Latest Legislative Action
Referred to Coms. on P. & C.P. and JUD.
Bill Sponsors
Name
Role
Allen
Coauthor
Cabaldon
Author
Jones
Coauthor
Ochoa Bogh
Coauthor
Weber Pierson
Coauthor
Full Legal Analysis
SB 1159 addresses the classification of artificial intelligence and similar nonhuman entities under various California laws. It specifies that terms such as 'person,' 'interested person,' 'participant,' and 'member of the public' in the California Public Records Act, the Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act, the Ralph M. Brown Act, the Political Reform Act of 1974, the Administrative Procedure Act, and the California Environmental Quality Act do not include artificial intelligence systems, autonomous agents, robots, or other nonhuman entities, whether physical or digital. This legislative measure aims to ensure that these laws apply solely to human entities, thereby maintaining the integrity of public access and governance provisions. The bill includes legislative findings to support this exclusion, aligning with constitutional requirements for public access to government records and meetings. The bill does not introduce new compliance requirements or penalties.
We use cookies for analytics to understand how visitors use this site. We also use essential cookies for site functionality.
See our Privacy Policy for details.