Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

IL HB 4799: AI SAFETY MEASURES ACT

In Committee Illinois

Last verified Oct 25, 2026 · official bill text

HB 4799 · where it stands

1 of 5 steps complete
  1. Introduced In committee
  2. Passed first chamber
  3. Passed both chambers
  4. Enacted
  5. Effective
What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Illinois's HB 4799 (104th General Assembly) would create the Transparency in Frontier Artificial Intelligence Act. Large frontier AI developers would have to adopt and publish a frontier AI framework covering catastrophic risk management, transparency and cybersecurity, and report critical safety incidents to the Attorney General, with civil penalties for noncompliance. It would also create a consortium to develop ILCompute, a public cloud computing resource. Referred to Rules February 6, 2026.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

Not law. If enacted, large frontier AI developers would need a published safety framework and incident reporting to the Attorney General, and could face civil penalties.

Key provisions

  1. Would create the Transparency in Frontier Artificial Intelligence Act (new Act)
  2. Large frontier developers would have to adopt and publish a frontier AI framework addressing catastrophic risk management, transparency and cybersecurity
  3. Catastrophic risk: a foreseeable and material risk that a frontier model will materially contribute to the death of or serious injury to more than 50 people, or more than $1,000,000,000 in property damage, from a single incident involving specified dangerous model conduct
  4. Critical safety incidents would have to be reported to the Attorney General, with civil penalties for noncompliance
  5. Department of Innovation and Technology would review and recommend updates to definitions and standards
  6. Would create a consortium to develop ILCompute, a public cloud computing resource, and exempt specified information from the Freedom of Information Act
  7. Filed February 2, 2026; first reading and referred to Rules Committee February 6, 2026

Latest legislative action

Feb 6, 2026. Referred to Rules Committee

Sponsors

NameRole
Primary

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error