Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

US SB1775: Protecting AI and Cloud Competition in Defense Act of 2025

Introduced United States (Federal) · 2025–2026 session

Last verified Oct 10, 2026 · official bill text

SB1775 · where it stands

1 of 5 steps complete
  1. Introduced Complete
  2. Passed first chamber
  3. Passed both chambers
  4. Enacted
  5. Effective
What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

The federal S. 1775 (Protecting AI and Cloud Competition in Defense Act of 2025) would require the Secretary of Defense to use a competitive award process for each procurement of cloud computing, data infrastructure or foundation model solutions, keep Government data under exclusive Government rights, and bar use of that data to train a covered provider's commercial products without express DoD authorization. Introduced May 15, 2025 and referred to the Senate Armed Services Committee; no further action.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None yet: the bill is pending. Cloud, data infrastructure and AI model vendors to DoD would face competitive awards and DFARS limits on using DoD data, with fines and contract termination for violations.

Key provisions

  1. The Secretary of Defense shall require a competitive award process for each procurement of cloud computing, data infrastructure or foundation model solutions and ensure the Government keeps exclusive rights to access and use all Government data
  2. The competitive process must address Government roles on intellectual property, data rights, security, interoperability and auditability, use modular open systems approaches, mitigate barriers to entry for small businesses and nontraditional contractors, and prioritize multi-cloud technology unless infeasible or a substantial danger to national security
  3. The Secretary shall direct the Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Office to update or issue DFARS provisions so Government-furnished data is not disclosed or used without DoD authorization, including not to train or improve a covered provider's commercial products without express authorization, and is protected on vendor systems
  4. Violations would be subject to specific penalties, including fines and contract termination (amounts not stated); component acquisition executives may grant exemptions if necessary for national security and notify the Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Office
  5. Covered provider: a cloud, data infrastructure or foundation model provider with DoD contracts totaling at least $50,000,000 in any of the 5 previous fiscal years; one prong of the foundation model definition requires at least 1,000,000,000 parameters, self-supervision and broad applicability; another covers models showing high performance at tasks posing serious risks
  6. Not later than January 15, 2027, and annually for four years after, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff must report on competition and market concentration in AI to the congressional defense committees, with a public version posted on a DoD website
  7. Introduced May 15, 2025 and referred to the Senate Armed Services Committee; the text sets no effective date or appropriations

Latest legislative action

May 15, 2025. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.

Related and companion bills

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error