Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

US SB2938: Artificial Intelligence Risk Evaluation Act of 2025

In Committee United States (Federal) · 2025–2026 session

Last verified Oct 10, 2026 · official bill text

SB2938 · where it stands

1 of 5 steps complete
  1. Introduced In committee
  2. Passed first chamber
  3. Passed both chambers
  4. Enacted
  5. Effective
What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

U.S. Congress's S. 2938, the Artificial Intelligence Risk Evaluation Act of 2025 (119th Congress), would require the Secretary of Energy to establish an Advanced Artificial Intelligence Evaluation Program. Developers of advanced AI systems (trained with more than 10^26 operations) would have to participate and give the Secretary requested materials, and could not deploy such a system in interstate or foreign commerce otherwise, with fines of at least $1,000,000 per day. It was referred to Senate Commerce on September 29, 2025; Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs held hearings September 30, 2026. It is pending in committee.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None yet: the bill is pending. If enacted, developers of AI systems trained with over 10^26 operations would have to join the program and supply requested materials, or face fines of at least $1,000,000 per day.

Key provisions

  1. Would define an advanced AI system as one trained using more than 10^26 integer or floating-point operations; the Secretary could propose a new definition by rule, which would not take effect until a joint resolution approving it is enacted
  2. Would require each covered advanced AI system developer to participate in the program and, on request, give the Secretary materials such as code, training data, model weights, the interface engine, and training and architecture information (Sec. 4(a))
  3. Would bar any person from deploying an advanced AI system in interstate or foreign commerce unless in compliance with the participation duty (Sec. 4(b))
  4. Would set a fine of not less than $1,000,000 per day for a violation of Sec. 4(a) or (b) (Sec. 4(c))
  5. Would define adverse AI incidents to include loss-of-control scenarios, weaponization by foreign adversaries, threats to critical infrastructure, and scheming behavior
  6. Introduced by Sens. Hawley and Blumenthal September 29, 2025 and referred to Commerce; Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs held hearings September 30, 2026; no floor action

Latest legislative action

Sep 30, 2026. Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Hearings held.

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error