Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

ID H0687: Adds to existing law to establish provisions regarding unbiased artificial intelligence in state government purchasing.

Dead/Failed Idaho · 2026 session

Last verified Oct 1, 2026 · official bill text

H0687 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action Mar 3, 2026.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Did not pass. H 687 would have let Idaho executive-branch agencies, including public colleges, buy or use a large language model only if it is 'truth-seeking' and 'ideologically neutral.' Agencies could not use models designed to alter facts or history to advance diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) outcomes, restrict lawful content based on race or sex, embed DEI-based guardrails, or require users to affirm DEI concepts. Contracts would have given agencies access to system prompts, training directives and test results to check compliance. It passed the House 56-11 but died in the Senate State Affairs Committee.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None: the bill did not pass. AI vendors selling to Idaho agencies face no neutrality or system-prompt disclosure rules from it.

Key provisions

  1. Would have added Idaho Code § 67-9236: agencies may procure, deploy or use an LLM only if it follows truth-seeking and ideological-neutrality principles
  2. Barred LLMs designed to alter facts for DEI outcomes, suppress lawful content based on race or sex, embed DEI-based guardrails, or require users to affirm DEI concepts
  3. Contracts must give agencies reasonable access to system prompts, content policies, model specs, testing results and, if needed, source code
  4. Agencies could terminate contracts for uncured material noncompliance and make vendors bear decommissioning costs
  5. Did not regulate AI outside state government and created no private right of action; would have taken effect on passage (emergency clause)
  6. Passed the House 56-11-3 on March 2, 2026; referred to Senate State Affairs, where it died

Latest legislative action

Mar 3, 2026. Referred to Senate State Affairs; no further action before the Legislature adjourned

Sponsors

NameRole
Primary
Primary
Primary

Roll call votes

Read Third Time in Full – Mar 2, 2026

56 yea11 nay3 otherPassed

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error