Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

ID H0917: Adds to existing law to require the use of AI to review administrative rules annually.

Dead/Failed Idaho · 2026 session

Last verified Oct 17, 2026 · official bill text

H0917 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action Mar 17, 2026.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Idaho's H 917 (2026) would have enacted the AI Regulatory Review Act (new Title 67, chapter 34), requiring every state agency to have an AI system review its regulations and guidance documents during its periodic review under Idaho Code 67-5292. Qualified agency staff would have had 30 days to verify and approve the AI's output, and no rule could be amended or repealed on AI analysis alone. Agencies would have had six months to start. It was introduced March 17, 2026, and then reported printed and referred to the Business Committee (undated), with no later action.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

No duties for businesses because the bill did not pass. Had it become law, it would have bound state agencies, not private parties.

Key provisions

  1. Would require AI-assisted review of all agency regulations and guidance documents, covering whether mandates are required by law, duplication, plain language, compliance costs and economic impact (§ 67-3404)
  2. Would bar amending or repealing a rule based solely on AI analysis; qualified personnel must approve all AI outputs within 30 days after the AI review (§ 67-3405)
  3. Agencies keeping a provision flagged by the AI would have to document why (§ 67-3405)
  4. Would require each agency to publish an annual report and present it to a legislative committee (§ 67-3406)
  5. Would require each agency, within six months, to acquire AI systems, complete the reviews and start rulemaking (§ 67-3407)
  6. Would have taken effect on passage and approval under an emergency clause; the text sets no penalties and no sunset

Latest legislative action

Mar 17, 2026. Reported Printed and Referred to Business

Sponsors

NameRole
Primary

Topics and industries

Related topics

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error