Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

LA SB 474: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY: Creates the Protecting Louisiana's Infrastructure from Artificial Intelligence Risk Act. (1/1/27)

Dead/Failed Louisiana

Last verified Oct 10, 2026 · official bill text

SB 474 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action Apr 21, 2026.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Louisiana's SB 474, the Protecting Louisiana's Infrastructure from Artificial Intelligence Risk Act, would have required developers of frontier AI models (trained with more than 10^26 operations) to publish transparency reports and report critical safety incidents, and would have required large frontier developers (over $500 million annual revenue) to publish a safety framework, obtain audits and certify compliance. The Attorney General could seek up to $1,000,000 per first violation. It passed no chamber: it was returned to the Senate calendar subject to call on April 21, 2026 and died.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None: the bill died and never became law. If enacted, frontier model developers would have faced publication, audit, incident-reporting and certification duties from January 1, 2027.

Key provisions

  1. Large frontier developers (with affiliates, over $500 million gross revenue) would have had to write, implement and publish a frontier AI framework, review it at least yearly and publish material changes within 30 days (R.S. 51:3111.3)
  2. All frontier developers would have had to publish a transparency report when deploying a new or substantially modified frontier model; large developers would also have had to send the Attorney General's office quarterly summaries of internal-use catastrophic risk assessments
  3. From July 1, 2028, large developers would have had to retain an independent auditor each year and certify compliance or deviations annually
  4. Critical safety incidents would have had to be reported within 15 days of discovery, or within 24 hours if there was an imminent risk of death, serious injury or an active critical infrastructure cyberattack (51:3111.4)
  5. Civil penalties would have been up to $1,000,000 per violation for a first violation and up to $10,000,000 for a second or later violation of the same requirement, enforced by the Attorney General (51:3111.7)
  6. Whistleblower protections for employees responsible for assessing critical safety incident risk, including an anonymous internal channel for large developers (51:3111.9)
  7. Would have preempted local rules adopted on or after July 1, 2027 that regulate frontier developers' catastrophic risk management (51:3111.8)
  8. Would have taken effect January 1, 2027; the Senate adopted floor amendments April 21, 2026 (technical wording and cross-reference fixes) and the bill went no further

Latest legislative action

Apr 21, 2026. Read by title and returned to the Calendar, subject to call; died when the Louisiana Legislature's 2026 regular session ended

Sponsors

NameRole
Primary

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error