Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

CA ACR215: 23 Asilomar AI Principles.

Enacted California · 2017–2018 session

Last verified Oct 6, 2026 · official bill text

ACR215 · where it stands

4 of 5 steps complete
  1. Introduced Complete
  2. Passed first chamber Complete
  3. Passed both chambers Complete
  4. Enacted Complete
  5. Effective Date not recorded
What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

California's Assembly Concurrent Resolution 215 expresses the Legislature's support for the 23 Asilomar AI Principles as guiding values for the development of artificial intelligence and of related public policy. The principles, drafted at a January 2017 meeting of AI researchers and others in Asilomar, California, cover research issues, ethics and values (such as safety, failure transparency, personal privacy and human control) and longer-term issues (such as catastrophic risks and recursive self-improvement). Adopted by the Assembly June 25, 2018 and the Senate August 30, 2018; filed September 7, 2018 (Res. Chapter 206). A concurrent resolution does not change the law.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

No duties for businesses. The resolution endorses the Asilomar AI Principles as guiding values; it does not change the law.

Key provisions

  1. Expresses the Legislature's support for the 23 Asilomar AI Principles as guiding values for the development of AI and of related public policy
  2. Recites the principles, drafted in January 2017 by AI researchers, economists, legal scholars, ethicists and philosophers meeting in Asilomar, California, and endorsed by more than 1,200 AI researchers as of March 2018
  3. Research issues: beneficial research goals, funding for research on beneficial use, science-policy exchange, a culture of cooperation, and avoiding a race that cuts corners on safety standards
  4. Ethics and values include safety, failure and judicial transparency, responsibility, value alignment, personal privacy, shared benefit, human control, non-subversion, and avoiding an arms race in lethal autonomous weapons
  5. Longer-term issues include: capability caution, planning for catastrophic or existential risks, strict safety and control measures for recursively self-improving AI, and developing superintelligence only for the common good
  6. Adopted by the Assembly June 25, 2018 and the Senate (39-0) August 30, 2018; filed with the Secretary of State September 7, 2018 (Res. Chapter 206, Statutes of 2018); a concurrent resolution needs no Governor's signature and creates no legal duties

Latest legislative action

Sep 7, 2018. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Res. Chapter 206, Statutes of 2018.

Sponsors (showing 5 of 73)

NameRoleDistrict
D Sponsor HD-021
D Sponsor HD-046
D Sponsor HD-066
D Sponsor SD-012
D Sponsor HD-063

Roll call votes

S Assembly 3rd Reading ACR215 Kiley et al. By Moorlach Aug 30, 2018

39 yea0 nay1 otherPassed

S Be adopted. Ordered to third reading Aug 14, 2018

5 yea0 nay2 otherPassed

A Be adopted. To third reading Jun 19, 2018

10 yea0 nayPassed

Topics and industries

Related topics

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error