Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

MA H614: Relative to issuing guidance regarding setting policies for the use of AI in schools

Introduced Massachusetts · 2025–2026 session

Last verified Nov 4, 2026 · official bill text

H614 · where it stands

1 of 5 steps complete
  1. Introduced Complete
  2. Passed first chamber
  3. Passed both chambers
  4. Enacted
  5. Effective
What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Massachusetts' H 614 would require the Commissioner of Elementary and Secondary Education to issue guidelines for school districts and charter schools on student and teacher use of AI. The guidance would cover AI's benefits and limitations, safe use, equity implications and factors for setting school AI policies, after at least three public hearings. Referred to the Education Committee February 27, 2025; hearing November 12, 2025; reporting date extended to March 18, 2026. It has not passed either chamber.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None yet: the bill is pending. It would put duties on the state education department, not businesses; edtech vendors could see districts draw on the state guidance when setting AI policies.

Key provisions

  1. Would amend G.L. c. 69, § 1A: the commissioner would issue guidelines, based on available best practices, for school districts and charter schools on student use of AI and educators' use of it in the classroom
  2. Guidance would cover the benefits and limitations of AI in education, how to promote safe use by students and teachers, equity implications, and factors schools should consider in setting AI policies
  3. The department would hold at least three public hearings to gather input from superintendent groups, school leaders and teachers
  4. The commissioner would update the guidelines as necessary and publish them on the department's website annually no later than September 1
  5. The bill says it takes effect immediately upon passage

Latest legislative action

Feb 9, 2026. Reporting date extended to Wednesday, March 18, 2026

Sponsors (showing 5 of 146)

NameRole
D Primary
Primary
D Cosponsor
D Cosponsor
D Cosponsor

Topics and industries

Related topics

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error