Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

IL SB 2909: SCH CD-TEACHER EVALUATION-AI

Enacted · set to take effect Jan 1, 2027 Illinois

Last verified Oct 2, 2026 · official bill text

SB 2909 · where it stands

4 of 5 steps complete
  1. Introduced Complete
  2. Passed first chamber Complete
  3. Passed both chambers Complete
  4. Enacted Complete
  5. Effective Jan 1, 2027
What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Illinois' Public Act 104-0565 (SB 2909) amends School Code Section 24A-5 on teacher evaluation plans. An evaluator may not use an AI tool to assign a numerical score or qualitative rating for any component of a teacher's evaluation or any evaluation task that requires professional judgment, and a teacher may not use an AI tool to generate evidence of professional practice used to evaluate the teacher; both may use AI to support administrative tasks. Any AI tool's name and specific purpose must be disclosed to the other party. Approved July 10, 2026; effective January 1, 2027.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

No direct duties for companies. AI tools used in Illinois teacher evaluations may support administrative tasks but may not assign scores or ratings, and each tool's name and purpose must be disclosed. The act sets no penalties.

Key provisions

  1. Amends School Code Section 24A-5 (105 ILCS 5/24A-5), which sets the required content of school districts' teacher evaluation plans
  2. An evaluator may not use an AI tool to assign a numerical score or qualitative rating, such as "excellent", "proficient", "need improvement" or "unsatisfactory", for any component of a teacher's evaluation or any evaluation task that requires professional judgment
  3. A teacher may not use an AI tool to generate evidence of professional practice that an evaluator will use to evaluate the teacher's performance
  4. Evaluators and teachers may each use AI tools to support them in administrative tasks
  5. If an evaluator uses an AI tool, its name and specific purpose must be disclosed to the teacher being evaluated; if a teacher uses one, its name and specific purpose must be disclosed to the evaluator
  6. The joint committee under Section 24A-4(b-5) determines how AI tools may be used in accordance with the evaluation plan components in paragraphs (a) through (o)
  7. Approved by the Governor July 10, 2026 (Public Act 104-0565); effective January 1, 2027

Latest legislative action

Jul 10, 2026. Public Act . . . . . . . . . 104-0565

Sponsors (showing 5 of 20)

NameRole
Primary
Primary
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor

Roll call votes

Education, Amendment 1 Mar 3, 2026

12 yea0 nay3 otherPassed

Education Feb 17, 2026

12 yea0 nay3 otherPassed

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error