Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

PA HB1993: Providing for the use of artificial intelligence in mental health therapy and for enforcement.

In Committee Pennsylvania · 2025–2026 session

Last verified Oct 31, 2026 · official bill text

HB1993 · where it stands

1 of 5 steps complete
  1. Introduced In committee
  2. Passed first chamber
  3. Passed both chambers
  4. Enacted
  5. Effective
What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Pennsylvania's HB 1993 (2025-26), the Artificial Intelligence in Mental Health Therapy Act, would bar mental health professionals from using AI to support recorded or transcribed therapy sessions without written notice and patient consent, bar AI providers from representing that an AI system can provide therapy or is a therapist, and bar AI from making independent therapeutic decisions. It was referred to the House Professional Licensure Committee on October 24, 2025.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None yet: the bill is pending. If enacted, AI providers could not market AI as a therapist, and mental health professionals would need written notice and consent before using AI for support in recorded or transcribed sessions.

Key provisions

  1. Would bar a mental health professional from using AI for supplementary support in a recorded or transcribed session unless the patient is informed in writing that AI will be used and its specific purpose, and consents
  2. Would bar an AI provider from stating, or knowingly causing or programming a system to state, that it can provide therapy or psychotherapy or is a therapist, counselor, psychiatrist, doctor or other provider
  3. Would bar making available an AI system specifically programmed to provide a service that would be the practice of a mental health professional if provided by a natural person
  4. Would bar a mental health professional from letting AI make independent therapeutic decisions, directly interact with a client in therapeutic communication, generate treatment plans without professional review and approval, or detect emotions or mental states
  5. Would let a mental health professional use AI only to the extent it meets the section 3 notice-and-consent rules; 'permitted use' is defined as administrative or supplementary support for which the professional keeps full responsibility
  6. Section 5 would make a violation unprofessional conduct under provisions of the licensing acts (the captured text ends there)
  7. Referred to the House Professional Licensure Committee on October 24, 2025

Latest legislative action

Oct 24, 2025. Referred to Professional Licensure

Sponsors (showing 5 of 133)

NameRole
Primary
D Primary
Primary
D Primary
Primary

Roll call votes (showing 3 of 15)

CONCURRENCE Jul 11, 2024

172 yea30 nay1 otherPassed

Committee vote (Rules): Re-report Bill As Committed Jul 11, 2024

33 yea0 nayPassed

Final Passage: PASSAGE Jul 10, 2024

48 yea1 nayPassed

Topics and industries

Related topics

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error