Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

US HB6275: China AI Power Report Act

In Committee United States (Federal) · 2025–2026 session

Last verified Oct 8, 2026 · official bill text

HB6275 · where it stands

1 of 5 steps complete
  1. Introduced In committee
  2. Passed first chamber
  3. Passed both chambers
  4. Enacted
  5. Effective
What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

H.R. 6275, the China AI Power Report Act, as introduced would require the Secretary of Commerce to report to the House Foreign Affairs and Senate Banking committees on China's advanced AI capabilities and AI supply chains: 180 days after enactment and annually for 3 years after. Introduced November 21, 2025 and referred to House Foreign Affairs, which ordered it reported with amendments on January 21, 2026 (47-0); this page describes the introduced text. It has not passed either house.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None yet: the bill has not been enacted. If enacted, it would impose no duties on businesses; Commerce would produce the reports.

Key provisions

  1. Commerce, consulting covered agency heads, would report within 180 days of enactment and annually for 3 years after
  2. Reports would assess Chinese AI chip designers (such as Huawei and Cambricon), chip and memory fabrication facilities, chipmaking equipment companies and EDA software firms
  3. Reports would also assess the Chinese AI models the Secretary finds most relevant to U.S. national security, including parameters, training compute and benchmark performance
  4. Section 2 states a sense of Congress that export controls on AI technologies must be dynamic and adaptive
  5. Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs November 21, 2025; ordered reported January 21, 2026

Latest legislative action

Jan 21, 2026. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 47 - 0.

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error