Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

US SB2615: VET Artificial Intelligence Act Validation and Evaluation for Trustworthy (VET) Artificial Intelligence Act

In Committee United States (Federal) · 2025–2026 session

Last verified Oct 1, 2026 · official bill text

SB2615 · where it stands

1 of 5 steps complete
  1. Introduced In committee
  2. Passed first chamber
  3. Passed both chambers
  4. Enacted
  5. Effective
What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

The VET AI Act would direct NIST to develop, within a year and update at least every 2 years, voluntary technical guidelines for internal and independent third-party assurance of AI systems: testing, evaluating, verifying and validating them. The guidelines would address consumer privacy, assessing and reducing harms, dataset quality, documentation and disclosure, and governance, and recommend how often and how deeply developers and deployers should be assessed based on risk. Commerce would convene an advisory committee on assessor qualifications and study the capacity of the AI assurance sector. Introduced July 31, 2025.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

No mandates. If enacted, AI developers and deployers would get voluntary NIST guidelines for internal and independent third-party testing and evaluation of their AI systems.

Key provisions

  1. NIST must develop voluntary guidelines and specifications for internal and external AI assurance within 1 year, reviewed at least every 2 years, after public comment of at least 30 days
  2. Guidelines address consumer privacy safeguards, assessing and mitigating harms, dataset quality, documentation and provenance disclosures, and governance and process controls
  3. Recommend how often, when and how deeply developers and deployers should conduct assurance based on risk and use case, and how to disclose results and corrective actions
  4. External assurance means an evaluation by a nonaffiliated, financially independent, qualified third party
  5. Guidelines may not require any specific solution or technology product and must recommend ways to protect confidential and proprietary information
  6. Commerce AI Assurance Qualifications Advisory Committee (up to 20 members) recommends assessor qualifications and accreditation
  7. Commerce studies the AI assurance sector's capabilities and market demand and reports to Congress

Latest legislative action

Jul 31, 2025. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error