Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

UT SB0205: Law Enforcement Artificial Intelligence Amendments

Dead/Failed Utah · 2026 session

Last verified Oct 10, 2026 · official bill text

SB0205 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action Mar 6, 2026.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Utah's SB 205 (2026), Law Enforcement Artificial Intelligence Amendments (second substitute), would have amended the 2025 law on police use of generative AI to require agency policies to cover available oversight or safeguard settings and to require agencies to post their policy publicly. It passed the Senate on February 26, 2026 (20-0-9); the House struck the enacting clause on March 6 and the Senate filed it.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None: the bill died and never became law. It would have required law enforcement agencies to document generative AI safeguard settings and post their AI policies publicly.

Key provisions

  1. Would define "oversight or safeguard setting" as a generative AI setting addressing transparency, content safeguards or human oversight, such as requiring minimum human editing, an AI-drafted acknowledgment, or limits on crime types
  2. Each agency's generative AI policy would have to say which generative AI technologies employees may use, each one's available safeguard settings, and whether the agency requires them, does not use them, or lets employees disable them
  3. An agency would have to publicly post its policy on its website (or on the Utah Public Notice Website if it has none) and update the posting within 30 days of a change; this would not apply to prison or jail security, safety or management
  4. Generative AI used for administrative tasks that do not materially impact an investigation, such as productivity, document management or spell-check tools, would not count as generative AI technology for the settings requirement
  5. An agency's failure to comply would not preclude use of the technology or of information or evidence created with it
  6. Would have taken effect May 6, 2026; passed the Senate 20-0-9 February 26, 2026; House struck the enacting clause March 6, 2026; Senate filed it

Latest legislative action

Mar 6, 2026. Senate/ filed (Senate file for bills not passed), after House/ strike enacting clause

Sponsors (showing 5 of 10)

NameRole
Primary
Primary
Primary
D Primary
D Primary

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error