Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

WV HB2431: Fourth Amendment Restoration Act

Dead/Failed West Virginia · 2025 session

Last verified Oct 10, 2026 · official bill text

HB2431 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action Feb 17, 2025.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

West Virginia's HB 2431, the Fourth Amendment Restoration Act (2025 regular session), would have barred law enforcement officers, and anyone acting for law enforcement purposes, from using seven listed technologies, including facial recognition, license plate readers and surveillance drones, unless a warrant based on probable cause authorizes use against a specific person. Knowing and willful use would be a felony. It was sent to House Judiciary on February 17, 2025 and went no further.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None: the bill did not pass. It would have barred law enforcement use of listed surveillance technologies, including facial recognition, without a warrant.

Key provisions

  1. Listed technologies (15-17-3): real-time security monitoring, multimodal vehicle recognition, facial recognition, gun or firearm recognition, surveillance drones, license plate readers and digital identity ecosystems
  2. Use allowed only under a warrant issued against a specific person based on probable cause
  3. Knowing and willful use by an officer or political subdivision official would be a felony: at least one year and a day in confinement and a fine of at least $10,000 per occurrence (15-17-4)
  4. Political subdivisions could not implement or use the technologies and would have to discontinue existing use immediately; an official who refused would commit the same felony
  5. A person whose rights are violated may sue the officer or official (15-17-5)
  6. Text says the article is effective upon passage; introduced February 17, 2025 and sent to House Judiciary with no later action

Latest legislative action

Feb 17, 2025. To House Judiciary

Sponsors (showing 5 of 7)

NameRoleDistrict
R Sponsor HD-097
R Sponsor HD-067
R Sponsor HD-033
R Sponsor HD-094
R Sponsor HD-071

Related and companion bills

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error