Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

AZ HB2737: Chatbot regulations; personal data; requirements

Dead/Failed Arizona · 2026 session

Last verified Oct 10, 2026 · official bill text

HB2737 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action Jan 21, 2026.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Arizona's HB 2737 (2026) would have limited how a chatbot provider may use personal data and chat logs: no processing personal data to inform output without a user's express request and affirmative consent, no using chat logs for advertising, no training on chat logs of minors without parental consent or of adults without consent, no selling chat logs, and no retention beyond ten years unless required. It was held in House committees with no action and died when the 2026 session ended June 13, 2026.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None: the bill died and never became law. It would have restricted chatbot providers' use of chat logs and personal data for output, advertising, training and sale, and required user access to chat logs.

Key provisions

  1. Would define a chatbot as an algorithmic or automated system that generates text, audio, image or video simulating interpersonal conversation, including AI
  2. Would bar processing personal data to inform chatbot output unless necessary for a user's express request and the user gives affirmative consent
  3. Would bar processing chat logs to decide, select or customize advertisements
  4. Would bar processing a minor's chat log and personal data (including for training) without parent or guardian affirmative consent when the provider knows or should have known the user is a minor, and training on an adult's data without affirmative consent
  5. Would bar profiling beyond what an express request needs, selling chat logs, and retaining a chat log more than ten years unless required by law
  6. Would bar discriminating or retaliating (denying service, charging different prices, lower quality) against users who refuse consent to training, and give users access to their own chat logs in a downloadable, easy-to-read format
  7. Held in House committees (Artificial Intelligence & Innovation; Rules) with no action; died June 13, 2026

Latest legislative action

Jan 21, 2026. House read second time; died when the 57th Arizona Legislature's 2026 regular session ended June 13, 2026

Sponsors (showing 5 of 44)

NameRole
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
R Primary

Roll call votes

Passed Apr 16, 2025

28 yea1 nay1 otherPassed

Passed Feb 26, 2025

53 yea6 nay1 otherPassed

Topics and industries

Related topics

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error