Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

CA SB579: Mental health and artificial intelligence working group.

Dead/Failed California · 2025–2026 session

Last verified Oct 8, 2026 · official bill text

SB579 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action Feb 2, 2026.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

California's SB 579 (as amended in the Senate March 26, 2025) would require the Secretary of Government Operations to appoint, on or before July 1, 2026, a mental health and artificial intelligence working group to evaluate AI's role in mental health settings. The group would hold at least three public meetings, report to the Legislature by July 1, 2028 and issue a followup report by January 1, 2030, and the provisions would be repealed January 1, 2031. It was held in the Senate Appropriations Committee on May 23, 2025 and is listed as an inactive bill that died.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None: the bill died and did not become law. It would have created a state working group with no direct duties for businesses, which could have given input.

Key provisions

  1. Would add Government Code § 12817, repealed on January 1, 2031 (the digest says July 1, 2031; the section text says January 1, 2031)
  2. The Secretary of Government Operations would appoint the working group and designate its chairperson on or before July 1, 2026
  3. It would evaluate AI's role in improving mental health outcomes, current and emerging AI technologies for diagnosis, treatment, monitoring and care, and risks such as automated systems, privacy concerns, chatbots and AI that impersonates a mental health professional
  4. Members would include four behavioral health professionals, three AI and technology experts, two patient advocates, two ethics and law experts, a public health agency appointee, the State Chief Information Officer, the Director of Health Care Services, the chief information officers of three other state agencies, departments or commissions, and one Senator and one Assembly Member
  5. It would take input from stakeholders including health organizations, academic institutions, technology companies and advocacy groups, and hold at least three public meetings
  6. Reports to the Legislature would be due by July 1, 2028 (uses, risks, benefits, best practices and a framework for training mental health professionals) and a followup by January 1, 2030
  7. Members would serve without compensation but be reimbursed for necessary expenses; the group would be subject to the Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act
  8. Status: held in committee and under submission in Senate Appropriations May 23, 2025; returned to the Secretary of the Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56 on February 2, 2026; inactive bill, died

Latest legislative action

Feb 2, 2026. Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

Sponsors (showing 5 of 17)

NameRole
Author
Author
Author
Author
Coauthor

Roll call votes

Placed on suspense file Apr 21, 2025

6 yea0 nay1 otherPassed

Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations] Mar 25, 2025

12 yea0 nay3 otherPassed

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error