Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

ID H945: ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE MEDICAL SERVICES – Adds to existing law to establish provisions regarding artifical intelligence medical services.

Dead/Failed Idaho

Last verified Oct 17, 2026 · official bill text

H945 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action Mar 25, 2026.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Idaho's H 945 (2026) would have enacted the AI Medical Services Act (new Title 54, chapter 60), creating an 11-member Board of Autonomous Medical Practice to license 'artificial intelligence augmented and autonomous service providers' (AAASPs) that deliver certain clinical AI services. New licenses would have been provisional for up to two years. L2 and L3 licensees would have owed patient disclosures and a duty of loyalty, and the board could have fined violators up to $10,000 per count or offense. It was introduced March 25, 2026, and then reported printed and referred to the Business Committee (undated), with no later action.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

No duties for businesses because the bill did not pass. Had it become law, clinical AI developers would have needed a state license before offering covered services in Idaho.

Key provisions

  1. Would create the Board of Autonomous Medical Practice, with 11 voting members appointed by the governor (§ 54-6003)
  2. Would require a license for critical advisory AI, certain clinical supervised AI and all fully autonomous AI; informational AI, advisory AI for preventive, chronic or noncritical conditions, and some preventive supervised AI exempt (§ 54-6004)
  3. Would require disclosures from L2 licensees and, for fully autonomous (L3) care, the patient's affirmative acknowledgment before services (§ 54-6005)
  4. Would impose a duty of loyalty on L2 and L3 licensees, ban ads and sponsored content in clinical encounters, and require two-year retention of algorithm snapshots (§ 54-6006)
  5. Would set a provisional sandbox license of up to two years, a surety bond of at least $50,000, liability insurance and a wind-down plan (§ 54-6007)
  6. Would bar offering or deploying a clinical AI service that requires a license without one; the board could issue cease-and-desist orders and fines up to $10,000 per count or offense (§ 54-6009)
  7. Would have taken effect July 1, 2026 under an emergency clause; last action: reported printed and referred to Business (undated), with no later action shown

Latest legislative action

Mar 25, 2026. Reported Printed and Referred to Business

Sponsors

NameRole
Primary

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error