Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

KS SB467: Enacting the use of artificial intelligence in medical decisions transparency act and requiring that all medical necessity determinations be made by …

Dead/Failed Kansas · 2025–2026 session

Last verified Oct 13, 2026 · official bill text

SB467 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action Apr 10, 2026.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.
View full title

Enacting the use of artificial intelligence in medical decisions transparency act and requiring that all medical necessity determinations be made by a competent licensed physician or healthcare professional.

In one paragraph

Kansas's SB 467 (2026) would have enacted the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Decisions Transparency Act. Health insurers and utilization review organizations using AI, algorithms or software tools for utilization review would have had to ensure the tool bases decisions on the enrollee's clinical information and does not supplant provider decision-making, and the tool could not deny, delay or modify care on medical necessity; only a licensed physician or competent licensed professional could. Referred to committee February 4, 2026; Died in Committee April 10, 2026.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None: the bill did not pass. It would have kept AI and software tools from denying, delaying or modifying care on medical necessity at health insurers and utilization review firms, and required filed written policies.

Key provisions

  1. Applies to health insurers and utilization review organizations that use AI, algorithms or other software tools for utilization review or management based in whole or part on medical necessity, directly or through a contractor
  2. The tool would have to base determinations on the enrollee's clinical history, individual circumstances and relevant clinical information, not solely a group dataset
  3. The tool could not supplant provider decision-making, discriminate in violation of law, or directly or indirectly cause harm to the enrollee; it would be periodically reviewed, fairly applied and HIPAA-compliant
  4. The tool could not deny, delay or modify healthcare services based on medical necessity; only a licensed physician or competent licensed healthcare professional could make that determination
  5. Health insurers would have to set written utilization review policies, file them with the Kansas Department of Insurance and disclose them to insureds, providers and the public on request
  6. Introduced February 3, 2026; referred to Senate Financial Institutions and Insurance February 4; Died in Committee April 10, 2026

Latest legislative action

Apr 10, 2026. Died in Committee

Sponsors (showing 5 of 12)

NameRole
Primary
Original Sponsor
Original Sponsor
Original Sponsor
Original Sponsor

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error