Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

MO HB2273: Modifies and establishes provisions relating to the protection of children and vulnerable persons

Effective Aug 28, 2026 Missouri · 2026 session

Last verified Oct 12, 2026 · official bill text

HB2273 · where it stands

All steps complete
  1. Introduced Complete
  2. Passed first chamber Complete
  3. Passed both chambers Complete
  4. Enacted Complete
  5. Effective Since Aug 28, 2026
What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Missouri's 2026 HB 2273 (with HBs 1946, 1814 and 2551) creates RSMo 573.570, disclosure of an intimate digital depiction. Disclosing, or threatening to disclose, a realistic intimate image of an identifiable person that was created or altered by digital manipulation, with intent to harass or cause harm or with reckless disregard for harm, is a felony. A disclaimer that the image is unauthorized is not a defense. The same section was also enacted by HBs 2637 & 3155 and SB 999. It takes effect Aug. 28, 2026.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

Platforms get a safe harbor for good-faith removal of AI-generated intimate images; sharing such fabricated images of identifiable people in Missouri is a felony.

Key provisions

  1. RSMo 573.570: defines digital depiction (a realistic visual depiction created or altered using digital manipulation) and intimate digital depiction
  2. Disclosing an intimate digital depiction with intent to harass or harm, or with knowledge of or reckless disregard for harm, is a class D felony; threatening to disclose is a class E felony
  3. Class C felony for a repeat offense, or if the depiction could affect government proceedings, an election or foreign relations, or facilitate violence
  4. A disclaimer that the depiction is unauthorized is not a defense
  5. Safe harbor for interactive computer services acting in good faith to restrict access to such depictions
  6. New RSMo 27.117 lets prosecutors request Attorney General help with multi-jurisdiction cases under 573.570

Latest legislative action

Apr 7, 2026. Approved by Governor

Topics and industries

Related topics

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error