Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

NY A10231: Establishes the position of chief artificial intelligence officer and such person's functions, powers and duties; including, but not limited to, deve…

Dead/Failed New York · 2023–2024 session

Last verified Oct 8, 2026 · official bill text

A10231 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action May 15, 2024.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.
View full title

Establishes the position of chief artificial intelligence officer and such person's functions, powers and duties; including, but not limited to, developing statewide artificial intelligence policies and governance, coordinating the activities of any and all state departments, boards, commissions…

In one paragraph

New York's A 10231 (2023-2024 session) would have created an Office of Artificial Intelligence in the Office of Information Technology Services, headed by a chief artificial intelligence officer appointed by the Governor with Senate consent, to set statewide AI policy, coordinate and audit state agencies' use of AI and automated decision-making systems, and report annually to the legislature. It also would have created an advisory committee. It was introduced May 15, 2024 and referred to Governmental Operations; it did not pass, and the 2023-2024 session ended without action.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None: the bill did not pass. It would have applied to state agencies, not private businesses.

Key provisions

  1. Would have defined "artificial intelligence" and "automated decision-making system" in State Technology Law § 101
  2. Would have created the Office of Artificial Intelligence (new § 102-a) under a chief AI officer appointed by the Governor with Senate advice and consent
  3. The office would have developed state AI policy, a procurement handbook, a risk management plan and human-oversight standards for state agencies
  4. It would also have coordinated agency AI use, recommended deactivating non-compliant AI applications, audited agencies' AI tools, and reported annually to the Senate and Assembly leaders
  5. Would have created an advisory committee for state AI policy (new § 104-a), chaired by the chief AI officer
  6. Would have taken effect 90 days after becoming law; referred to Governmental Operations 5/15/2024 and not passed

Latest legislative action

May 15, 2024. referred to governmental operations

Sponsors (showing 5 of 6)

NameRole
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Cosponsor

Related and companion bills

Topics and industries

Related topics

AI in Government

Affected industries

Government

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error

Related AI laws in New York

All New York bills →
S08831 Provides for the use of automated employment decision-making tools and artificia S07599 Regulates automated decision-making by government agencies; requires agencies to S00822 Relates to the disclosure of automated employment decision-making tools; require S07543 Enacts the legislative oversight of automated decision-making in government act S3971 Creates a temporary state commission to study and investigate how to regulate ar S10425 Requires policing agencies to conduct an inventory of, and develop a publicly-av

Same topic in other states

Washington HB 1170 Informing users when content is developed or modified by artificial intelligence California SB 1159 Artificial intelligence: transparency and governance. Tennessee HB 1455 Computers and Electronic Processing - As enacted, requires TACIR to study artifi Montana SB397 Generally revise laws related to privacy and facial recognition technology Utah HB444 Data Privacy Amendments New Jersey AJR164 Establishes "New Jersey Advanced Autonomous Vehicle Task Force."