Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

TN SB1346: AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 28 and Title 39, Chapter 17, relative to the unauthorized use of deepfake or actual likeness.

Effective Jul 1, 2025 Tennessee · 2025–2026 session

Last verified Oct 8, 2026 · official bill text

SB1346 · where it stands

All steps complete
  1. Introduced Complete
  2. Passed first chamber Complete
  3. Passed both chambers Complete
  4. Enacted Complete
  5. Effective Since Jul 1, 2025
What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Tennessee's SB 1346, the Preventing Deepfake Images Act (Tenn. Code § 39-17-1901 et seq.), lets a person shown in an intimate digital depiction (a realistic digitally created or altered image appearing to show them nude or in sexual conduct) sue anyone who intentionally discloses it knowing, or recklessly disregarding, that they did not consent. Remedies: the defendant's gains, actual or $150,000 liquidated damages, punitive damages and fees. Disclosing or threatening to disclose one to harass or harm is a Class E felony (Class C if reasonably expected to affect a government proceeding or election, or to facilitate violence). Signed May 9, 2025 (Public Chapter 466); effective July 1, 2025.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

Online platforms and information or telecom services are not liable for others' content or good-faith removal. Anyone who intentionally discloses an intimate digital depiction without written consent risks suits ($150,000 liquidated damages) and, if meant to harass or harm, felony charges.

Key provisions

  1. Defines deepfakes as videos, images or audio generated or manipulated by AI to realistically portray something that did not occur; the civil and criminal rules apply to intimate digital depictions: realistic depictions created or altered by digital manipulation that appear to show an identifiable person's intimate parts, bodily sexual fluids, or sexually explicit conduct
  2. Civil action (§ 39-17-1903) against a person who intentionally discloses the depiction knowing or recklessly disregarding the lack of consent; for minors and incapacitated or deceased individuals, a guardian, estate representative, family member or court-appointed person may sue, never the defendant
  3. Consent to creation is not consent to disclosure; consent is valid only in a plain-language written agreement signed knowingly and voluntarily that generally describes the depiction and any work it will be part of
  4. Remedies: the defendant's monetary gain; actual damages (including emotional distress) or $150,000 liquidated damages; punitive damages; costs and reasonable attorney fees; injunctions, pseudonymous plaintiffs and in camera proceedings
  5. No civil claim for good-faith disclosures to or by law enforcement, in legal proceedings, or to assist the depicted individual; a disclaimer that the depiction was unauthorized is no defense, civil or criminal
  6. Crime (§ 39-17-1906): disclosing, threatening to disclose, or soliciting disclosure with intent to harass, annoy, threaten, alarm or cause substantial financial or reputational harm, or knowing or recklessly disregarding that it will cause physical, emotional, reputational or economic harm; Class E felony, Class C felony if it could reasonably be expected to affect a governmental proceeding (including an election) or facilitate violence
  7. Interactive computer, information and telecommunications service providers are not liable for good-faith steps to restrict access, for providing the technical means to restrict access, or for content provided by another person
  8. Passed the Senate 32-0 (April 15, 2025) and the House 94-0 (April 21, 2025, substituted for companion HB 1299); signed May 9, 2025 (Public Chapter 466); effective July 1, 2025

Latest legislative action

May 15, 2025. Pub. Ch. 466 (signed by the Governor May 9, 2025)

Sponsors (showing 5 of 8)

NameRole
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary

Roll call votes

Floor Vote: VOTE: REGULAR CALENDAR PASSAGE ON THIRD CONSIDERATION 4/21/2025 Passed (1) Apr 21, 2025

94 yea0 nayPassed

Floor Vote: VOTE: as Amended Third Consideration 4/15/2025 Passed (1) Apr 15, 2025

32 yea0 nayPassed

SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE: Recommended for passage with amendment/s, refer to Senate Calendar Committee Ayes 8, Nays 0 PNV 0 4/2/2025 Passed (2) Apr 2, 2025

8 yea0 nayPassed

Topics and industries

Related topics

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error