Get emailed when this bill changes status, is amended, or advances.
Disclaimer: This page provides general informational summaries only and does not constitute legal advice. AI-generated content may contain errors. Always consult a qualified attorney for guidance specific to your situation.
Read full disclaimer →
SB2925 instructs the FTC to study neural data governance. The full bill text may include additional provisions affecting the study's scope and implications.
If you handle neural data, monitor FTC updates for potential governance changes.
State
United States (Federal)
Bill Number
SB2925
Status
Introduced
Risk Level
Medium
Category
Study/Task Force
Last Action
Sep 29, 2025
Last Verified
May 4, 2026
Data Updated
May 4, 2026
What do these statuses mean?▼
Introduced— Filed in the legislature; not yet heard in committee
In Committee— Assigned to and being reviewed by a legislative committee
Passed— Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action
Signed / Enacted— Signed into law by the governor; may or may not be in effect yet
Dead / Vetoed— Vetoed, failed to pass, or session expired without action
Unknown— Status data not yet available or awaiting classification
Affected Industries
Data ManagementData PrivacyTechnologyHealthcare
What This Means
The MIND Act of 2025 directs the Federal Trade Commission to study neural data governance. The full bill text may contain additional provisions affecting the study.
Key Provisions
Directs the FTC to conduct a study on neural data governance.
Latest Legislative Action
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. (text: CR S6834-3836)
Full Legal Analysis
SB2925, known as the MIND Act of 2025, is a federal bill introduced to mandate the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to conduct a study on the governance of neural data and related data types. This analysis is based on the official description, not the full bill text, which may contain additional provisions or details. Due to the unavailability of the full text, the specific scope, methodology, and expected outcomes of the study are not detailed. It is unclear what specific aspects of neural data governance will be examined or how the findings might be utilized. The analysis refrains from making speculative statements about the potential implications of the study without supporting evidence from the bill text.
We use cookies for analytics to understand how visitors use this site. We also use essential cookies for site functionality.
See our Privacy Policy for details.