Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

CA AB1337: Information Practices Act of 1977.

Dead/Failed California

Last verified Oct 11, 2026 · official bill text

AB1337 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action Jun 25, 2026.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

California's AB 1337 (Ward) is mainly a government privacy bill. As amended in the Senate June 1, 2026, it would recast the Information Practices Act of 1977, beginning January 1, 2028, to cover local agencies as well as state agencies and to expand the definition of personal information. The AI-related part is narrow: personal information could exist in formats that include artificial intelligence systems capable of outputting it. Passed the Assembly 64-0 June 2, 2025; final Senate hearing canceled June 25, 2026; dead.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None: the bill did not pass. Had it passed, it would have bound state and local government agencies, not private businesses.

Key provisions

  1. Beginning January 1, 2028, the Act would apply to local agencies, removing the current exemption for them (Civ. Code 1798.3)
  2. Personal information would expressly include biometric information, genetic data, precise geolocation data, neural data, and vehicle registration and license plate information
  3. Personal information could exist in abstract digital formats, including compressed or encrypted files, metadata, or artificial intelligence systems that are capable of outputting personal information
  4. For recurring contact, an initial notice plus a periodic notice at least once every three years would satisfy the form-notice requirement (now not more than one-year intervals); negligent as well as intentional violations by an officer or employee would be cause for discipline
  5. Would remove the requirement that wrongful disclosure of medical, psychiatric, or psychological information cause economic loss or personal injury to be a misdemeanor (Sec. 1798.57)
  6. Status: passed Assembly 64-0 (June 2, 2025); failed passage in a Senate committee July 15, 2025 with reconsideration granted; amended June 1, 2026; final hearing canceled at author's request June 25, 2026

Latest legislative action

Jun 25, 2026. In committee: Set, final hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

Sponsors (showing 5 of 17)

NameRole
Author
Author
Author
Author
Author

Roll call votes (showing 3 of 5)

Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations] Jul 15, 2025

6 yea2 nay5 other

[First] hearing set for [07-16-2025]: Failed passage in Committee. Reconsideration granted Jul 15, 2025

13 yea0 nayPassed

AB 1337 Ward Assembly Third Reading Jun 3, 2025

64 yea0 nay15 otherPassed

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error