Disclaimer: This page provides general informational summaries only and does not constitute legal advice. AI-generated content may contain errors. Always consult a qualified attorney for guidance specific to your situation.
Read full disclaimer →
AI Summary
SB574 addresses the use of generative AI by legal professionals, detailing obligations, penalties, procedural rules, and enforcement mechanisms.
Business Impact
If you use AI in legal practice, you must comply with new regulations once SB574 is enacted.
What do these statuses mean? ▼
Introduced
— Filed in the legislature; not yet heard in committee
In Committee
— Assigned to and being reviewed by a legislative committee
Passed
— Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action
Signed / Enacted
— Signed into law by the governor; may or may not be in effect yet
Dead / Vetoed
— Vetoed, failed to pass, or session expired without action
Unknown
— Status data not yet available or awaiting classification
Affected Industries
Topics How we classify →
What This Means
California SB574 proposes amendments to regulate the use of generative AI by legal professionals. It aims to add Section 6068.1 to the Business and Professions Code and proposes changes to Sections 128.7 and 1282.1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, including specific penalties.
Key Provisions
- Add Section 6068.1 to the Business and Professions Code detailing obligations for ethical AI use, including confidentiality and accuracy
- Propose amendments to Section 128.7 of the Code of Civil Procedure including AI content disclosure requirements
- Introduce Section 1282.1 to the Code of Civil Procedure specifying AI procedural rules in arbitration, such as disclosure of AI involvement
- Include penalties such as fines and suspension, and enforcement mechanisms involving State Bar oversight for ethical AI use
Latest Legislative Action
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
Bill Sponsors (showing 5 of 33)
| Name | Role |
|---|---|
| Aguiar-Curry | Coauthor |
| Alarcon | Author |
| Alpert | Author |
| Benoit | Coauthor |
| Boatwright | Author |
Roll Call Votes (showing 3 of 4)
Special Consent ·
Jan 29, 2026
39 Yea
0 Nay
1 Other
Passed ✓
Do pass ·
Jan 22, 2026
7 Yea
0 Nay
Passed ✓
Placed on suspense file ·
Jan 20, 2026
7 Yea
0 Nay
Passed ✓
Compliance Checklist
Ensure no confidential information is entered into public AI systems.
Who: Attorneys
Deadline: Upon enactment of the bill
Penalty: Potential sanctions by the court
Who: Attorneys
Deadline: Upon enactment of the bill
Penalty: Potential sanctions by the court
Verify and correct AI-generated content before use in legal documents.
Who: Attorneys
Deadline: Upon enactment of the bill
Penalty: Potential sanctions by the court
Who: Attorneys
Deadline: Upon enactment of the bill
Penalty: Potential sanctions by the court
Do not delegate decision-making to generative AI tools.
Who: Arbitrators
Deadline: Upon enactment of the bill
Penalty: Potential sanctions by the court
Who: Arbitrators
Deadline: Upon enactment of the bill
Penalty: Potential sanctions by the court
Disclose reliance on AI-generated information to parties.
Who: Arbitrators
Deadline: Upon enactment of the bill
Penalty: Potential sanctions by the court
Who: Arbitrators
Deadline: Upon enactment of the bill
Penalty: Potential sanctions by the court
Full Legal Analysis
SB574 is a legislative proposal in California aimed at regulating the use of generative artificial intelligence by attorneys and arbitrators. The bill proposes to add Section 6068.1 to the Business and Professions Code, detailing specific obligations for attorneys to ensure ethical AI use, such as maintaining client confidentiality and ensuring AI-generated content is accurate and reliable. It seeks to amend Section 128.7, which includes disclosure requirements for AI-generated content in legal documents. Additionally, it introduces Section 1282.1 to the Code of Civil Procedure, specifying procedural rules for AI use in arbitration, such as requiring parties to disclose AI involvement in decision-making processes. The bill also outlines potential penalties, including fines and suspension of practice, for non-compliance and enforcement mechanisms involving oversight by the State Bar to ensure adherence to these regulations.
Official Source
Official Bill Text
View SB574 on official legislature website →
Related Topics
Affected Industries
More California AI Legislation
SB59
Change of name or gender and sex identifier.
Low
SB348
State Air Resources Board: Low Carbon Fuel Standard.
Medium
AB976
Personal Income Tax Law: Corporation Tax Law: California Retail Secur…
Low
AB 1979
Health care services: artificial intelligence.
High
AB 2545
Report: labor force impact: artificial intelligence.
Medium
AB2545
Report: labor force impact: artificial intelligence.
Medium
View All CA Laws →
More California AI Laws
Browse all published AI bills and regulations for California.