Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

IL HB 3720: AI-MEANINGFUL HUMAN REVIEW

In Committee Illinois

Last verified Oct 11, 2026 · official bill text

HB 3720 · where it stands

1 of 5 steps complete
  1. Introduced In committee
  2. Passed first chamber
  3. Passed both chambers
  4. Enacted
  5. Effective
What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Illinois's HB 3720 (104th General Assembly) would create the Meaningful Human Review of Artificial Intelligence Act. A State agency, or an entity acting for one, would be prohibited from using an automated decision-making system for specified agency functions without continuous meaningful human review, and agencies seeking to use such a system would have to perform impact assessments and submit them to the Governor and General Assembly. Re-referred to the House Rules Committee on March 21, 2025.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

Not law. If enacted, State agencies and entities acting for them could not use automated decision-making systems for agency functions without continuous meaningful human review; agencies would do impact assessments.

Key provisions

  1. Would create the Meaningful Human Review of Artificial Intelligence Act (new Act)
  2. Would bar State agencies, and entities acting on their behalf, from using an automated decision-making system for the agency's specified functions without continuous meaningful human review
  3. Would require State agencies seeking to use such a system (with continuous meaningful human review) to perform an impact assessment
  4. Assessment would cover the system's objectives, its ability to meet them, its development, testing, and any notification process for people affected and their rights and options
  5. Would require impact assessments to be submitted to the Governor and the General Assembly
  6. Assigned to the Cybersecurity, Data Analytics, & IT Committee March 11, 2025; Rule 19(a) re-referral to Rules Committee March 21, 2025

Latest legislative action

Mar 21, 2025. Rule 19(a) / Re-referred to Rules Committee

Sponsors

NameRole
Primary

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error