Get emailed when this bill changes status, is amended, or advances.
Disclaimer: This page provides general informational summaries only and does not constitute legal advice. AI-generated content may contain errors. Always consult a qualified attorney for guidance specific to your situation.
Read full disclaimer →
This bill prohibits Missouri state agencies from engaging in biometric analysis of photographs and digital data, with specific exceptions for individuals in state custody and law enforcement.
If you operate a state agency in Missouri, you must cease biometric analysis of digital data immediately or face misdemeanor charges.
State
Missouri
Bill Number
HB1925
Status
Unknown
Risk Level
High
Category
Comprehensive
Last Action
May 15, 2026
Last Verified
May 29, 2026
Data Updated
May 29, 2026
What do these statuses mean?▼
Introduced— Filed in the legislature; not yet heard in committee
In Committee— Assigned to and being reviewed by a legislative committee
Passed— Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action
Signed / Enacted— Signed into law by the governor; may or may not be in effect yet
Dead / Vetoed— Vetoed, failed to pass, or session expired without action
Unknown— Status data not yet available or awaiting classification
Affected Industries
General
What This Means
House Bill 1925 seeks to restrict state agencies in Missouri from conducting biometric analysis on photographs and digital data. It outlines specific exceptions for academic purposes, law enforcement, individuals in state custody, and public assistance identification. The bill establishes penalties for violations, making compliance critical for affected entities.
Key Provisions
Prohibits state agencies from engaging in biometric analysis of photographs and digital data.
Allows colleges and universities to conduct biometric analysis for academic purposes with consent.
Permits law enforcement to collect biometric data for ongoing investigations and for identifying persons of interest.
Allows biometric data collection for individuals in state custody and for public assistance identification.
Establishes penalties for unauthorized sharing or accessing of biometric data.
Defines 'biometric analysis' in accordance with existing Missouri law.
Latest Legislative Action
Referred: Emerging Issues(H)
Bill Sponsors
Name
Role
Gregg Bush
Primary
Adrian Plank
Cosponsor
Compliance Checklist
Cease all biometric analysis of photographs and digital data Who: All state agencies and departments in Missouri Penalty: Class A misdemeanor for violations
Obtain consent for any biometric analysis conducted by colleges or universities Who: Colleges and universities engaging in biometric analysis Penalty: Not specified, but must comply to avoid violations
Full Legal Analysis
House Bill 1925 introduces a prohibition on state agencies and departments in Missouri from engaging in biometric analysis of photographs and digital data. This includes any form of biometric data retention, with certain exceptions outlined in the bill. Notably, colleges and universities can conduct biometric analysis for academic purposes if consent is obtained from the subject. Law enforcement agencies are also exempted for specific investigative purposes, including identifying or monitoring individuals who are persons of interest in ongoing investigations. Additionally, the bill allows the collection and use of biometric data for individuals in the custody, control, or care of the state, and for identification to receive public assistance. The bill mandates that any biometric data collected during open investigations or from convicted individuals may be retained indefinitely. However, it strictly prohibits any unauthorized sharing or accessing of biometric data, establishing penalties ranging from class A misdemeanors to class C felonies for violations. Key definitions include 'biometric analysis,' which encompasses various forms of biometric data analysis as defined in existing Missouri law. This bill aligns with growing concerns over data privacy and surveillance, reflecting a trend seen in other states that are also implementing stricter regulations on biometric data usage. Compliance will be essential for state agencies and related entities to avoid significant legal repercussions.
We use cookies for analytics to understand how visitors use this site. We also use essential cookies for site functionality.
See our Privacy Policy for details.