Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

NJ AR158: Urges generative artificial intelligence companies to make voluntary commitments regarding employee whistleblower protections.

Dead/Failed New Jersey · 2024–2025 session

Last verified Oct 8, 2026 · official bill text

AR158 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action Jan 30, 2025.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

New Jersey Assembly Resolution 158 urges generative AI companies to commit to principles that protect employees who raise risk-related concerns: no non-disparagement agreements over such concerns or retaliation through vested economic benefits, a verifiably anonymous process to reach the board, regulators and an independent organization, no retaliation for public disclosure after other processes fail, and legal and technical safe harbor for good-faith safety evaluation. The Assembly adopted it 74-0 on January 30, 2025. It is a resolution of one chamber that does not change the law.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

No duties for businesses. A nonbinding Assembly request that generative AI companies adopt whistleblower protections and safe harbor for good-faith safety research.

Key provisions

  1. Urges generative AI companies not to enter into or enforce agreements prohibiting disparagement or criticism over risk-related concerns, or retaliate for risk-related criticism by hindering any vested economic benefit
  2. A verifiably anonymous process for current and former employees to raise risk-related concerns with the company board, regulators and an appropriate independent organization
  3. A culture of open criticism letting current and former employees raise risk-related concerns with the public, the board, regulators or an independent organization, with trade secrets and other intellectual property protected
  4. Legal and technical safe harbor for good-faith system evaluation, protecting evaluators from legal reprisal, account suspension or termination
  5. No retaliation against current and former employees who publicly share risk-related confidential information after other processes have failed
  6. Copies go to the chief executive officers of leading generative AI companies including OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Inflection, Meta, Midjourney and Cohere
  7. Adopted by the Assembly (74-0-0) and filed with the Secretary of State January 30, 2025; identical Senate resolution SR121; a resolution of one chamber, not a law

Latest legislative action

Jan 30, 2025. Resolution Passed Assembly (74-0-0); Filed with Secretary of State

Sponsors (showing 5 of 20)

NameRole
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary

Roll call votes

3RDG FINAL PASSAGE Jan 30, 2025

74 yea0 nay6 otherPassed

Reported out of Assembly committee with amendments Oct 21, 2024

7 yea0 nayPassed

Related and companion bills

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error