Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

OH HB469: Declare A.I. systems nonsentient; prohibit legal personhood

In Committee Ohio · 2025–2026 session

Last verified Oct 11, 2026 · official bill text

HB469 · where it stands

1 of 5 steps complete
  1. Introduced In committee
  2. Passed first chamber
  3. Passed both chambers
  4. Enacted
  5. Effective
What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Ohio's HB 469 would enact chapter 1357 declaring AI systems nonsentient for all purposes under state law and barring them from legal personhood, marriage, serving as corporate officers or directors, and owning property. Harm caused by an AI system would be the responsibility of the owner or user, and developers or manufacturers could be liable for design or instruction defects that proximately cause harm. Owners would have to maintain oversight, and owners or developers would have to report serious incidents. Introduced September 23, 2025; referred to committee October 1, 2025.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None unless enacted: the bill is in committee. If enacted, owners, developers and manufacturers of AI systems in Ohio would carry liability for harm, oversight duties and an incident-notification duty.

Key provisions

  1. Would declare AI systems nonsentient and bar them from legal personhood or any claim to consciousness or self-awareness (1357.02)
  2. Would void marriage or union with an AI system and the appointment of an AI system as an officer, director or manager (1357.03, 1357.04)
  3. Would bar AI systems from owning property, with assets attributed to the person responsible for the AI system (1357.05)
  4. Would make owners or users responsible for harm from an AI system's operation, output or recommendation, and let developers or manufacturers be liable for defects that proximately cause harm (1357.06)
  5. Would require owners to maintain oversight and control measures where outputs could affect human welfare, property or public safety (1357.07)
  6. Would require owners or developers to promptly notify authorities of incidents causing significant bodily harm, death or major property damage (1357.12)
  7. Status: referred to House Technology and Innovation Committee on October 1, 2025; pending

Latest legislative action

Oct 1, 2025. Referred to committee (House Technology and Innovation)

Sponsors (showing 5 of 44)

NameRole
Primary
Primary
Primary
R Primary
R Primary

Roll call votes

Passage Dec 4, 2024

66 yea20 nayPassed

Reported - Substitute Dec 4, 2024

10 yea1 nayPassed

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error