Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

OH SB163: Regards AI images, simulated child porn, replica identity fraud

Passed One Chamber Ohio · 2025–2026 session

Last verified Oct 11, 2026 · official bill text

SB163 · where it stands

2 of 5 steps complete
  1. Introduced Complete
  2. Passed first chamber Complete
  3. Passed both chambers
  4. Enacted
  5. Effective
What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Ohio's Sub. SB 163 passed the Senate on May 20, 2026 and was referred to the House Technology and Innovation Committee on May 27, 2026. As passed by the Senate it would require generative AI systems to put a visible watermark on generated images and video, require covered providers to include provenance data, bar knowingly removing a watermark or distributing AI content with false statements about its authenticity with intent to deceive, extend child sexual material offenses to artificially generated depictions of a minor, and address identity fraud using a replica of a person.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None unless enacted: the bill has passed only the Senate. If enacted, generative AI systems would have to watermark generated images and video, and providers of consumer tools in Ohio would have to include provenance data.

Key provisions

  1. Would require generative AI systems to be programmed to place a distinctive watermark on generated images and videos, and covered providers to include provenance data (new 1349.13)
  2. Would bar knowingly, with intent to deceive a third party, removing a required watermark or distributing fully AI-generated content with false information about its authenticity
  3. Would let an aggrieved person sue for damages if the person files a complaint with the Attorney General and the Attorney General does not file an action within six months; the Attorney General could seek an injunction and, for watermark removal, a civil penalty of up to $10,000
  4. Would give the Attorney General investigation and subpoena powers (new 1349.14)
  5. Would add 'an artificially generated depiction of a minor' to child sexual material offenses, including section 2907.322 (the captured text shows these sections only in excerpts)
  6. Per its title, would also prohibit identity fraud using a replica of a person (section 2913.49)
  7. Status: passed Senate May 20, 2026; referred to House committee May 27, 2026; not yet law

Latest legislative action

May 27, 2026. Referred to committee (House Technology and Innovation)

Sponsors (showing 5 of 22)

NameRoleDistrict
R Sponsor SD-031
R Sponsor SD-033
R Sponsor SD-026
D Sponsor SD-009
R Sponsor SD-004

Roll call votes

S Senate Passed May 20, 2026

30 yea0 nayPassed

S Senate Favorable Passage May 20, 2026

6 yea0 nayPassed

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error