Get emailed when this bill changes status, is amended, or advances.
Disclaimer: This page provides general informational summaries only and does not constitute legal advice. AI-generated content may contain errors. Always consult a qualified attorney for guidance specific to your situation.
Read full disclaimer →
If you develop or use AI in Tennessee, you must ensure compliance with personhood definitions to avoid legal ambiguities.
State
Tennessee
Bill Number
HB 849
Status
Passed Both Chambers
Risk Level
Low
Category
Amendment
Last Action
Apr 28, 2026
Last Verified
May 29, 2026
Data Updated
May 29, 2026
Version
v2
What do these statuses mean?▼
Introduced— Filed in the legislature; not yet heard in committee
In Committee— Assigned to and being reviewed by a legislative committee
Passed— Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action
Signed / Enacted— Signed into law by the governor; may or may not be in effect yet
Dead / Vetoed— Vetoed, failed to pass, or session expired without action
Unknown— Status data not yet available or awaiting classification
Affected Industries
Artificial IntelligenceTechnology
What This Means
Tennessee's HB 849 clarifies the legal definition of 'person' to explicitly exclude artificial intelligence and related technologies. This legislative move defines the legal status of AI systems.
Key Provisions
Defines 'person' to exclude artificial intelligence and related technologies.
Amends Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 1.
Clarifies legal boundaries for AI and machine entities.
Latest Legislative Action
Comp. became Pub. Ch. 781
Bill Sponsors (showing 5 of 7)
Name
Role
District
Chris ToddR
Sponsor
HD-073
Dennis PowersR
Sponsor
HD-036
Esther Helton-HaynesR
Sponsor
HD-030
Gino BulsoR
Sponsor
HD-061
Jay ReedyR
Sponsor
HD-074
Justin PearsonD
Sponsor
HD-086
Michele ReneauR
Sponsor
HD-027
Roll Call Votes
H ·
HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE: Rec. for pass. if am., ref. to Calendar & Rules Committee ·
Apr 1, 2026
17 Yea 0 Nay 2 OtherPassed ✓
H ·
HOUSE CIVIL JUSTICE SUBCOMMITTEE: Rec for pass if am by s/c ref. to Judiciary Committee ·
Mar 18, 2026
6 Yea 0 Nay 1 OtherPassed ✓
Amendments (2)
SA0922Pending2026-03-30
HA0979Pending2026-04-01
Compliance Checklist
Review and update legal definitions in company policies regarding AI. Who: Legal and compliance teams. Penalty: Potential legal ambiguities if not updated.
HB 849 amends the Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 1, to clarify that the term 'person' does not encompass artificial intelligence, computer algorithms, software programs, computer hardware, or any type of machine. This legislative change establishes a clear legal boundary regarding the status of AI and related technologies. While the bill does not directly impose new compliance or liability requirements on businesses, it is important for companies utilizing AI technologies to be aware of this definition. The bill does not specify penalties for non-compliance, as it primarily serves to clarify definitions rather than impose new obligations. This amendment aligns with similar legislative trends in other states that seek to define the legal status of AI.
We use cookies for analytics to understand how visitors use this site. We also use essential cookies for site functionality.
See our Privacy Policy for details.