Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

US HB3460: AI Whistleblower Protection Act

Introduced United States (Federal) · 2025–2026 session

Last verified Oct 8, 2026 · official bill text

HB3460 · where it stands

1 of 5 steps complete
  1. Introduced Complete
  2. Passed first chamber
  3. Passed both chambers
  4. Enacted
  5. Effective
What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

H.R. 3460, the AI Whistleblower Protection Act, would bar employers from retaliating against employees and independent contractors, including former ones, who report AI security vulnerabilities or AI violations to regulators, Congress or supervisors. Remedies would include reinstatement and double back pay. Introduced May 15, 2025 and referred to the House Education and Workforce Committee; it has not passed either house.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None yet: the bill has not been enacted. If enacted, any employer engaged in commerce would be barred from retaliating against employees or contractors who report AI violations or AI security vulnerabilities.

Key provisions

  1. Would bar employers from discharging, demoting, suspending, threatening, blacklisting, harassing or otherwise discriminating against a covered individual for lawful reporting or assisting an investigation
  2. Protected reports cover an AI security vulnerability or AI violation (a violation of federal law related to AI, or failure to respond to a substantial and specific danger to public safety, health or national security), or conduct the person reasonably believes is one, made to regulators, the Attorney General, law enforcement, Congress or a supervisor
  3. Complaints go to the Secretary of Labor; if no final decision within 180 days and the delay is not due to the person's bad faith, the person may sue in federal district court with a jury trial
  4. Relief: reinstatement, 2 times back pay with interest, compensatory damages including litigation costs and attorneys' fees
  5. Rights could not be waived by contract or forced into arbitration before seeking relief
  6. Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce May 15, 2025

Latest legislative action

May 15, 2025. Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.

Related and companion bills

Topics and industries

Related topics

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error