Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

UT HB0606: Surveillance and Investigatory Technology Amendments

Dead/Failed Utah

Last verified Oct 11, 2026 · official bill text

HB0606 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action Mar 6, 2026.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Utah's H.B. 606 (Rep. Ryan D. Wilcox), Surveillance and Investigatory Technology Amendments, would have limited a law enforcement agency's use of surveillance or investigatory technology, defined to include facial recognition systems, biometric surveillance information, and location tracking, with "technology" defined to include AI technology. The limits would start July 1, 2027. The enacting clause was struck and the bill filed as not passed on March 6, 2026.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None: the bill did not pass. Had it passed, Utah law enforcement agencies would have faced limits on surveillance and investigatory technology, including AI, plus annual reporting and private lawsuits for prohibited use.

Key provisions

  1. Would retitle Chapter 23e "Limitations on Government Use of Technology", make the existing facial recognition rules Part 1, and add Part 2 (Secs. 77-23e-201 to 205) on law enforcement use of technology for surveillance or investigatory purposes
  2. "Technology" would include artificial intelligence technology; covered tools include biometric surveillance information, facial recognition systems, imaging surveillance devices, location tracking, open-source data gathering, and reverse-keyword and reverse-location data
  3. On or after July 1, 2027, an agency could not use such technology unless statutory conditions are met (the captured text ends before the conditions)
  4. Information obtained in violation would be excluded in certain circumstances, and a private right of action against the agency would be created with governmental immunity waived
  5. Agencies would report annually to the State Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice, which would report to the Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Interim Committee; the reporting would be repealed July 1, 2033
  6. Status: introduced February 27, 2026; House struck the enacting clause and filed it March 6, 2026

Latest legislative action

Mar 6, 2026. House/ filed (House file for bills not passed)

Sponsors

NameRole
Primary

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error