In one paragraph
Utah HB 366 (2024) is a criminal justice bill whose AI-relevant provisions limit algorithmic decision-making. Courts may not rely solely on an algorithm or a risk assessment tool score when deciding on diversion or determining a sentence (Utah Code 77-18-103). The Administrative Office of the Courts must collect data on risk assessment scores. Other provisions on the sentencing commission chair and escape offenses are unrelated to AI. Effective May 1, 2024.
Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.
What it means for business
Vendors of risk assessment and algorithmic tools used in Utah criminal justice must expect human decision-makers to treat scores as advisory only.
Key provisions
- Court may not rely solely on an algorithm or risk assessment tool score in approving diversion
- Utah Code 77-18-103: court may not rely solely on an algorithm or risk assessment score in sentencing
- Administrative Office of the Courts collects data on risk assessment scores
- Other sections (commission chair, escape crimes) are not AI-related
Latest legislative action
Mar 13, 2024. Governor Signed; Laws of Utah 2024, Chapter 187
Topics and industries
Related topics
Affected industries
This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error