Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

WA SB6280: Concerning the use of facial recognition services.

Effective Jul 1, 2021 Washington · 2019–2020 session

Last verified Oct 12, 2026 · official bill text

SB6280 · where it stands

All steps complete
  1. Introduced Complete
  2. Passed first chamber Complete
  3. Passed both chambers Complete
  4. Enacted Complete
  5. Effective Since Jul 1, 2021
What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Washington's Chapter 257, Laws of 2020 (ESSB 6280) governs state and local government use of facial recognition services (chapter 43.386 RCW). Before use, an agency must give notice to its legislative authority and publish an accountability report after public comment and community meetings. Decisions with legal or similarly significant effects require meaningful human review; services must be tested in operational conditions and vendors must allow independent accuracy and bias testing. Ongoing surveillance, real-time identification and persistent tracking need a warrant, exigent circumstances or a court order. The governor vetoed section 10 (a task force). Effective July 1, 2021.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

Facial recognition vendors selling to Washington agencies must support independent bias testing and disclose bias complaints; agencies face reporting and review duties.

Key provisions

  1. Notice of intent and a public accountability report before an agency develops, procures or uses a facial recognition service
  2. Meaningful human review of decisions that produce legal or similarly significant effects
  3. Operational testing before deployment; vendors must offer an API or similar for independent accuracy and bias testing
  4. Periodic training for staff who operate the service or process its results
  5. Warrant, exigent circumstances or court order required for ongoing surveillance, real-time identification or persistent tracking
  6. Results cannot alone establish probable cause; use based on protected characteristics or First Amendment activity is barred
  7. Section 10 (facial recognition task force) vetoed

Latest legislative action

Mar 31, 2020. Governor partially vetoed. Chapter 257, 2020 Laws PV. Effective date 7/1/2021.

Sponsors (showing 5 of 10)

NameRoleDistrict
D Sponsor SD-030
D Sponsor SD-026
D Sponsor SD-043
D Sponsor SD-032
D Sponsor SD-034

Roll call votes (showing 3 of 4)

H House Final Passage as recommended by the Conference Committee Mar 12, 2020

53 yea43 nay2 otherPassed

S Senate Final Passage as Recommended by Conference Committee Mar 12, 2020

27 yea21 nay1 otherPassed

H House Final Passage as Amended by the House Mar 6, 2020

63 yea33 nay2 otherPassed

Topics and industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error