Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

WA SB6120: Regulating high-risk artificial intelligence system development, deployment, and use.

Dead/Failed Washington · 2025–2026 session

Last verified Oct 16, 2026 · official bill text

SB6120 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action Jan 14, 2026.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Washington's SB 6120 (2026 session), the Senate companion to HB 2157, would have required developers and deployers of high-risk AI systems, those intended to make or be a substantial factor in consequential decisions such as employment, lending, housing, insurance, health care and education, to use reasonable care against algorithmic discrimination. It included developer documentation, deployer risk programs and impact assessments, consumer notices, and private lawsuits for injunctions. It had a first reading on January 14, 2026 and died at adjournment.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None: the bill did not pass. It would have required developers and deployers of high-risk AI used for consequential decisions to document and assess their systems and notify consumers.

Key provisions

  1. Developers (doing business in Washington, over $100,000 gross annual revenue) must use reasonable care, give deployers an intended-use statement and documentation of limitations and mitigation, and update disclosures within 90 days of an intentional and substantial modification (Sec. 2)
  2. Outputs of high-risk generative AI that creates or substantially modifies synthetic content must be identifiable and detectable, with limits for artistic works and certain text-only content (Sec. 2(7))
  3. Deployers must use reasonable care, keep a risk management policy and program, complete impact assessments before deployment and significant updates, and keep records at least three years (Sec. 3)
  4. Deployers must tell consumers they are dealing with an AI system and explain principal reasons for adverse decisions that rely on personal data beyond what the consumer provided (Sec. 3(4)-(5))
  5. Exemptions include HIPAA covered entities and telemedicine providers for certain services, insurers regulated by the insurance commissioner, certain financial institutions and federal-government acquisitions; the party claiming an exemption bears the burden (Sec. 4)
  6. A person may sue a developer or deployer for an injunction and attorneys' fees; affirmative defense if the violation is cured within 45 days of discovery with notice to the plaintiff (Sec. 5)
  7. Would have taken effect January 1, 2027 (Sec. 9). Died in Senate Environment, Energy & Technology after first reading

Latest legislative action

Jan 14, 2026. First reading, referred to Environment, Energy & Technology.

Sponsors (showing 5 of 10)

NameRole
Primary
Primary
Primary
Primary
Cosponsor

Topics and industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error