AL HB465: Artificial intelligence, limit the use of facial recognition, to ensure artificial intelligence is not the only basis for arrest
Under Review
Get emailed when this bill changes status, is amended, or advances.
Data Under Review
This bill's information is currently being re-verified for accuracy. Some details may have changed since our last confirmed update. For the most current information, please check your state legislature's official website.
Disclaimer: This page provides general informational summaries only and does not constitute legal advice. AI-generated content may contain errors. Always consult a qualified attorney for guidance specific to your situation.
Read full disclaimer →
HB465 aims to regulate the use of facial recognition technology in law enforcement by ensuring it cannot be the sole basis for arrests. This bill is significant for law enforcement agencies and technology providers involved in AI applications.
Key Provisions
Facial recognition technology cannot be the sole basis for an arrest.
The bill suggests the need for additional evidence beyond facial recognition.
The bill aims to enhance accountability in the use of AI technologies.
Latest Legislative Action
Read for the first time and referred to the House of Representatives committee on Judiciary
Bill Sponsors (showing 5 of 10)
Name
Role
Coleman
Primary
Grimsley
Primary
Hulsey
Primary
Jim HillR
Primary
Johnson
Primary
Mooney
Primary
Moore (B)
Primary
Rex ReynoldsR
Primary
Scott
Primary
Stubbs
Primary
Compliance Checklist
Ensure facial recognition is not the only basis for arrests Who: Law enforcement agencies Penalty: Legal consequences for non-compliance
HB465 seeks to impose limitations on the use of facial recognition technology by law enforcement in Alabama. Specifically, it mandates that facial recognition cannot be the only basis for making an arrest, which suggests the need for additional corroborating evidence or methods. While the bill is still in the introduced stage, its implications could lead to increased scrutiny and accountability in the deployment of AI technologies in policing. Similar regulations have been enacted in other states, reflecting a growing trend towards cautious use of AI in law enforcement.
We use cookies for analytics to understand how visitors use this site. We also use essential cookies for site functionality.
See our Privacy Policy for details.