Disclaimer: This page provides general informational summaries only and does not constitute legal advice. AI-generated content may contain errors. Always consult a qualified attorney for guidance specific to your situation.
Read full disclaimer →
AI Summary
SB1047 aimed to regulate large AI models but was vetoed by the Governor, who cited concerns about neglecting smaller models and the need for evidence-based regulation.
Business Impact
If you develop large AI models in California, you must implement safeguards or face regulatory penalties.
What do these statuses mean? ▼
Introduced
— Filed in the legislature; not yet heard in committee
In Committee
— Assigned to and being reviewed by a legislative committee
Passed
— Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action
Signed / Enacted
— Signed into law by the governor; may or may not be in effect yet
Dead / Vetoed
— Vetoed, failed to pass, or session expired without action
Unknown
— Status data not yet available or awaiting classification
Affected Industries
Topics
What This Means
SB1047 proposed significant regulations for large AI models, including a state oversight board. The Governor's veto highlighted concerns about neglecting smaller models and the need for empirical evidence in AI regulation.
Key Provisions
- Requires developers of large AI models to implement safeguards against catastrophic harm.
- Establishes the Board of Frontier Models for oversight of AI development.
- Mandates compliance with safety protocols for AI systems.
- Addresses risks associated with the deployment of AI technologies.
- Focuses on accountability, fairness, and transparency in AI systems.
- Encourages a regulatory framework that adapts to evolving AI capabilities informed by empirical evidence.
Latest Legislative Action
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
Bill Sponsors
| Name | Role | District |
|---|---|---|
| Scott Wiener D | Sponsor | SD-011 |
| Richard Roth D | Sponsor | SD-031 |
| Susan Rubio D | Sponsor | SD-022 |
| Henry Stern D | Sponsor | SD-027 |
Roll Call Votes
S — 2024-04-02
9 Yea
0 Nay
2 Other
Passed ✓
S — 2024-04-23
11 Yea
0 Nay
5 Other
Passed ✓
S — 2024-05-06
7 Yea
0 Nay
Passed ✓
S — 2024-05-16
5 Yea
0 Nay
2 Other
Passed ✓
S — 2024-05-21
32 Yea
1 Nay
7 Other
Passed ✓
A — 2024-06-18
8 Yea
0 Nay
3 Other
Passed ✓
A — 2024-07-02
9 Yea
1 Nay
2 Other
Passed ✓
A — 2024-08-15
11 Yea
3 Nay
1 Other
Passed ✓
S — 2024-08-29
30 Yea
9 Nay
1 Other
Passed ✓
A — 2024-08-28
48 Yea
16 Nay
15 Other
Passed ✓
Compliance Checklist
Implement safeguards for AI models
Who: Developers of large AI models
Penalty: Regulatory penalties for non-compliance
Who: Developers of large AI models
Penalty: Regulatory penalties for non-compliance
Engage with the Board of Frontier Models for oversight
Who: Developers and providers of computing power for AI models
Penalty: Potential sanctions for failing to comply with oversight requirements
Who: Developers and providers of computing power for AI models
Penalty: Potential sanctions for failing to comply with oversight requirements
Full Legal Analysis
🔒
Full Analysis for Subscribers
Get the complete legal breakdown, compliance checklist, enforcement timeline, and expert commentary on SB1047.
Unlock Full Analysis →Official Source
Official Bill Text
View SB1047 on official legislature website →
Related Topics
Affected Industries
More California AI Legislation
AB2441
Public employment: local public transit agencies: autonomous transit …
Medium
AJR6
Artificial intelligence.
Low
AB594
Artificial intelligence.
Low
SB892
Public contracts: automated decision systems: procurement standards.
Medium
AB3050
Artificial intelligence.
Medium
AB2652
State Department of Education: artificial intelligence working group.
Low
View All CA Laws →
More California AI Laws
Browse all AI bills and regulations tracked for California.