Get emailed when this bill changes status, is amended, or advances.
Disclaimer: This page provides general informational summaries only and does not constitute legal advice. AI-generated content may contain errors. Always consult a qualified attorney for guidance specific to your situation.
Read full disclaimer →
SB1047 proposed significant regulations for developers of large AI models, including the establishment of a regulatory board. The bill aimed to ensure safety and accountability in AI development.
Key Provisions
Requires developers of large AI models to implement unspecified safeguards.
Proposes the establishment of a regulatory board for oversight of AI development.
Addresses the need for accountability and transparency in AI systems.
Latest Legislative Action
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
Bill Sponsors (showing 5 of 29)
Name
Role
Allen
Author
Alquist
Author
Ammiano
Principal Coauthor
Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review
Author
Committee on Business, Professions and Economic Development
Author
Correa
Principal Coauthor
Costa
Author
Daucher
Principal Coauthor
Dickinson
Principal Coauthor
Harman
Coauthor
Hill
Coauthor
Huff
Author
Hughes
Principal Coauthor
Irwin
Coauthor
Jeffries
Coauthor
Kopp
Author
Limón
Author
Murray
Author
Niello
Author
Nielsen
Author
Ochoa Bogh
Coauthor
Poochigian
Author
Roth
Coauthor
Rubio
Coauthor
Speier
Principal Coauthor
Stern
Author
Walters
Author
Wiener
Author
Wolk
Principal Coauthor
Roll Call Votes (showing 3 of 10)
Unfinished Business SB1047 Wiener et al. Concurrence ·
Aug 29, 2024
30 Yea 9 Nay 1 OtherPassed ✓
SB 1047 Wiener Senate Third Reading By Bennett ·
Aug 28, 2024
48 Yea 16 Nay 15 OtherPassed ✓
Do pass as amended. ·
Aug 15, 2024
11 Yea 3 Nay 1 OtherPassed ✓
Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] ·
Jul 2, 2024
9 Yea 1 Nay 2 OtherPassed ✓
Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Judiciary] ·
Jun 18, 2024
8 Yea 0 Nay 3 OtherPassed ✓
3rd Reading SB1047 Wiener et al. ·
May 21, 2024
32 Yea 1 Nay 7 OtherPassed ✓
Do pass as amended ·
May 16, 2024
5 Yea 0 Nay 2 OtherPassed ✓
Placed on suspense file ·
May 6, 2024
7 Yea 0 NayPassed ✓
Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] ·
Apr 23, 2024
11 Yea 0 Nay 5 OtherPassed ✓
Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Governmental Organization] ·
Apr 2, 2024
9 Yea 0 Nay 2 OtherPassed ✓
Compliance Checklist
Implement safeguards for AI models Who: Developers of large AI models Penalty: Potential regulatory scrutiny
Engage with the Board of Frontier Models Who: AI developers and computing power providers Penalty: Non-compliance may lead to oversight actions
Full Legal Analysis
SB1047 sought to add Chapter 22.6 to the Business and Professions Code and Sections 11547.6 and 11547.6.1 to the Government Code, focusing on the regulation of large artificial intelligence models. It required developers and providers of computing power for these models to implement unspecified safeguards. The bill also proposed the creation of a regulatory board to oversee compliance and ensure safety protocols were in place. The Governor's action on the bill is not confirmed, and no official reasoning is provided in the bill text. The analysis of the Governor's concerns about innovation impact is not supported by the bill text. The debate continues on the appropriate threshold for AI regulation and the balance between safety and innovation.
We use cookies for analytics to understand how visitors use this site. We also use essential cookies for site functionality.
See our Privacy Policy for details.