Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

CA SB1142: Digital Dignity Act.

Dead/Failed California

Last verified Oct 11, 2026 · official bill text

SB1142 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action May 14, 2026.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

California's SB 1142 (2025-26 Regular Session), the Digital Dignity Act, would have imposed specified liability on a person who distributes content with actual knowledge it uses a digital replica and is found guilty of a crime requiring false impersonation or liable for defamation arising from the replica. It would also have required large online platforms with a generative AI tool to let individuals report digital replica content and to remove it on a court order. It was held in Senate Appropriations on May 14, 2026 and was not passed before the session ended.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None: the bill died and never became law. It would have required large online platforms with generative AI tools that create digital replicas to provide reporting and court-order takedown processes.

Key provisions

  1. Would add Chapter 22.6.1 (commencing with Section 22650) to the Business and Professions Code and Section 3344.2 to the Civil Code
  2. Specified liability for distributing content with actual knowledge that it uses a digital replica, where the person is found guilty of a criminal provision with false impersonation as an element, or is found liable for defamation in a civil action arising from the digital replica
  3. A large online platform that includes a generative AI tool letting users create a digital replica of others would have to provide a mechanism for individuals to report content involving their digital replica that violates the platform's terms of service or law, and to submit certified court orders or judgments
  4. On receiving an order or judgment, the platform would have to remove the digital replica and make reasonable efforts to remove known identical copies
  5. A city attorney or the Attorney General could sue for a specified civil penalty and injunctive relief
  6. Status: held in committee and under submission May 14, 2026; the session ended without passage

Latest legislative action

May 14, 2026. May 14 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.

Sponsors (showing 5 of 53)

NameRole
Coauthor
Coauthor
Coauthor
Author
Coauthor

Topics and industries

Related topics

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error