Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

CA SB1146: Advertisement claims: health-related consumer products and services: digital replicas and synthetic performers.

Dead/Failed California · 2025–2026 session

Last verified Oct 8, 2026 · official bill text

SB1146 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action Aug 13, 2026.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

California's SB 1146 (Gonzalez) would add Business and Professions Code 651.4, requiring a person who creates an advertisement for a health-related consumer product or service that includes a digital replica or synthetic performer depicted as a health care provider to include a clear and conspicuous disclosure that the provider was AI-generated or altered or that no human provider is depicted. Passed the Senate 36-0 on May 18, 2026; held in Assembly Appropriations August 13, 2026; it did not pass.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None: the bill did not pass. It would have required advertisers of health-related products and services using AI-generated or synthetic health care providers to disclose that in the ad, and let people whose digital replica was used sue.

Key provisions

  1. Would apply to ads for a health-related consumer product or service (marketed primarily for personal, family or household use as having a health benefit, such as dietary supplements and medical and dental goods and services)
  2. Would apply to an ad that includes a digital replica or synthetic performer depicted as a health care provider, defined as a person licensed under the Business and Professions Code division
  3. The creator of the ad would have to include a clear and conspicuous disclosure, defined as one that is difficult to miss and easily understandable to a reasonable consumer
  4. Would state that it does not authorize use of a digital replica for commercial purposes without the individual's consent
  5. Would provide that a violation constitutes a violation of Business and Professions Code 17500 enforceable under the Unfair Competition Law, and not a misdemeanor under the article regulating healing arts licensees
  6. A natural person whose digital replica is used in a violating ad could sue the ad's creator for any appropriate remedy, including injunctive relief; remedies would be cumulative with other law, including Civil Code 3344
  7. Introduced February 18, 2026; passed the Senate 36-0 May 18, 2026; held in Assembly Appropriations under submission August 13, 2026

Latest legislative action

Aug 13, 2026. August 13 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.

Sponsors

NameRoleDistrict
D Sponsor SD-033

Roll call votes (showing 3 of 5)

S Senate 3rd Reading SB1146 Gonzalez May 18, 2026

36 yea0 nay4 otherPassed

S Do pass May 14, 2026

6 yea0 nay1 otherPassed

S Placed on suspense file Apr 27, 2026

7 yea0 nayPassed

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error