Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

FL H1395: Artificial Intelligence

Dead/Failed Florida · 2026 session

Last verified Oct 10, 2026 · official bill text

H1395 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action Mar 13, 2026.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Not law: died in subcommittee. Florida's HB 1395 (2026) would have created an "Artificial Intelligence Bill of Rights" (new part IX of ch. 501): parental consent and controls for minors on companion chatbot platforms, an hourly not-human pop-up for bots, a ban on selling users' personal information unless deidentified, and consent for commercial use of generative-AI likenesses. It would also have barred government AI contracts with foreign-country-of-concern entities. It died on March 13, 2026.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None: the bill died in subcommittee and creates no obligations for AI companies, chatbot operators or government vendors in Florida.

Key provisions

  1. Would have barred governmental entities from knowingly contracting for AI technology with entities owned or controlled by, or based in, a foreign country of concern; from July 1, 2026 bidders would sign an affidavit (s. 287.138)
  2. Companion chatbot platforms would have had to bar minors (17 or younger) without parent or guardian consent and give parents controls: copies of chats, time limits, and alerts on self-harm intent (s. 501.9984)
  3. Operators would have had to show a pop-up at the start of a bot interaction and at least hourly that the user is not talking to a human (s. 501.9985)
  4. AI technology companies would not have been allowed to sell or disclose users' personal information unless deidentified (s. 501.9986)
  5. Using a generative-AI-created name, image or likeness for commercial or advertising purposes would have required the person's consent (s. 540.08)
  6. Enforced by the Department of Legal Affairs as unfair trade practices, with civil penalties up to $50,000 per violation; minor account holders could also sue a companion chatbot platform for up to $10,000 in damages
  7. Filed January 9, 2026; referred to four House committees; died in the Information Technology Budget & Policy Subcommittee on March 13, 2026; would have taken effect July 1, 2026

Latest legislative action

Mar 13, 2026. Died in Information Technology Budget & Policy Subcommittee

Topics and industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error