Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

CA SB771: Personal rights: liability: social media platforms.

Vetoed California

Last verified Oct 1, 2026 · official bill text

SB771 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (vetoed) · last action Mar 2, 2026.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Vetoed. California's SB 771 would have made social media platforms with more than $100 million in yearly gross revenue liable for civil penalties when they violate state civil rights laws (Civil Code §§ 51.7, 51.9, 52 and 52.1) through algorithms that relay content to users, or aid, abet, conspire in or are joint tortfeasors in such violations: up to $1,000,000 per intentional, knowing or willful violation and $500,000 per reckless one, up to double if the platform knew or should have known the plaintiff was a minor. Vetoed by Governor Newsom October 13, 2025; veto sustained March 2, 2026.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None: the bill was vetoed and never became law. It would have exposed social media platforms with over $100 million in yearly revenue to penalties of up to $1 million per violation when their algorithms violate state civil rights laws.

Key provisions

  1. Would have added Civil Code Title 23 (§§ 3273.72-3273.74), "Social Media Platforms Endangering Californians", covering social media platforms (as defined in Bus. & Prof. Code § 22675) with more than $100,000,000 a year in gross revenues
  2. Liability for violating Civil Code § 51.7, 51.9, 52 or 52.1 through algorithms that relay content to users, or for aiding, abetting, acting in concert, conspiring or being a joint tortfeasor in a violation
  3. Civil penalty to a prevailing plaintiff, in addition to other remedies: up to $1,000,000 per intentional, knowing or willful violation and up to $500,000 per reckless violation; a court could award up to twice those amounts if the platform knew or should have known the plaintiff was a minor
  4. Deploying a content-relaying algorithm could be treated as the platform's own act, independent of the message relayed, and platforms would be deemed to have actual knowledge of how their algorithms deliver content to some users but not others
  5. Would have become operative January 1, 2027; waivers would have been void
  6. Passed both houses (Senate concurrence September 11, 2025); vetoed by the Governor October 13, 2025; stricken from file and veto sustained March 2, 2026

Latest legislative action

Mar 2, 2026. Veto sustained.

Sponsors (showing 5 of 64)

NameRole
Coauthor
Principal Coauthor
Coauthor
Coauthor
Coauthor

Roll call votes (showing 3 of 9)

Unfinished Business SB771 Stern et al. Concurrence Sep 11, 2025

30 yea8 nay2 otherPassed

SB 771 Stern Senate Third Reading By Bauer-Kahan Sep 11, 2025

51 yea2 nay27 otherPassed

Do pass as amended. Aug 29, 2025

11 yea1 nay3 otherPassed

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error