Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

FL S0972: Artificial Intelligence

Dead/Failed Florida · 2024 session

Last verified Oct 10, 2026 · official bill text

S0972 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action Mar 8, 2024.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Not law: died in committee. Florida's SB 972 (2024) would have created a nine-member Artificial Intelligence Advisory Council in the Department of Management Services, required each state agency to inventory its automated decision systems by July 1, 2025, and barred counties, municipalities and political subdivisions from regulating private or public use of AI. It died March 8, 2024. None of it became law through companion CS/CS/SB 1680 (Ch. 2024-118), which instead created a different advisory body, the Government Technology Modernization Council.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None: the bill died and creates no duties; it would have applied to state agencies and preempted local regulation of AI.

Key provisions

  1. Would have created s. 282.32: an advisory council of 2 senators, 2 representatives and 5 Governor appointees to study AI in state government, meeting monthly and reporting quarterly
  2. Would have required each state agency, with appropriated money, to inventory automated decision systems it develops, uses or procures (name, vendor, capabilities, data, bias testing, cost) and report by July 1, 2025 (s. 282.321)
  3. Would have required the Department of Management Services to adopt a rule on the report's form by January 1, 2025
  4. Would have stated that a county, municipality or political subdivision may not regulate the private or public use of AI systems (s. 282.323)
  5. Companion CS/CS/SB 1680 (Ch. 2024-118, effective July 1, 2024) did not enact this council, the agency inventory or the local preemption; its Government Technology Modernization Council (s. 282.802) must, among other duties, assess how automated decision systems affect constitutional and legal rights
  6. Filed December 15, 2023; died in Governmental Oversight and Accountability on March 8, 2024; would have taken effect July 1, 2024

Latest legislative action

Mar 8, 2024. Died in Governmental Oversight and Accountability, companion bill(s) passed, see CS/CS/SB 1680 (Ch. 2024-118)

Sponsors

NameRoleDistrict
R Sponsor SD-022

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error