Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

FL SB2D: Artificial Intelligence Bill of Rights

Dead/Failed Florida

Last verified Oct 10, 2026 · official bill text

SB2D · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action Apr 29, 2026.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Not law: passed the Senate but died in the House. Florida's SB 2-D (2026 special session D) would have created an "Artificial Intelligence Bill of Rights" (new part IX of ch. 501, F.S.): parental consent and parental controls for minors on companion chatbot platforms, an hourly pop-up telling users a bot is not human, limits on selling AI users' personal data, an AI-image consent rule for commercial use of name, image or likeness, rules for AI in schools and a ban on state contracts with AI vendors tied to foreign countries of concern. The Senate passed it 37-1 on April 28, 2026; it died in the House Information Technology Budget & Policy Subcommittee on April 29, 2026.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None: the bill died in the House and creates no obligations. Had it passed, chatbot operators, AI companies, AI vendors to government and schools would have faced new duties.

Key provisions

  1. Companion chatbot platforms would have had to bar a minor (17 or younger) from holding an account without a parent's or guardian's consent, give consenting parents copies of interactions, time limits and notice of self-harm intent, and show a break reminder at the start and at least hourly (s. 501.9984)
  2. Bot operators would have had to show a pop-up at the start of each interaction and at least once every hour that the user is not talking to a human (s. 501.9985)
  3. AI technology companies could not sell or disclose users' personal information unless it was deidentified data (s. 501.9986)
  4. Enforcement only by the Department of Legal Affairs under FDUTPA, with civil penalties up to $50,000 per violation and a 45-day cure period; minors could also sue for up to $10,000 for knowing or reckless violations (ss. 501.9984-501.9986)
  5. Commercial use of a person's name, image or likeness created with generative AI would have needed consent (s. 540.08); AI instructional tools would not have been available to students before grade 6 except in listed cases, with parental notice and opt-out (s. 1006.1495)
  6. Governmental entities could not knowingly contract for AI technology with an entity owned or controlled by the government of a foreign country of concern or organized or based there, and from July 1, 2026 would have needed a sworn affidavit from bidders for AI technology (s. 287.138)
  7. Would have taken effect July 1, 2026 (s. 15); died in the House on April 29, 2026 and did not become law

Latest legislative action

Apr 29, 2026. Died in Information Technology Budget & Policy Subcommittee

Sponsors

NameRole
Primary

Related and companion bills

Topics and industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error