Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

HI HB2152: Relating To Artificial Intelligence.

Dead/Failed Hawaii · 2024 session

Last verified Oct 15, 2026 · official bill text

HB2152 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action Jan 24, 2024.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Hawaii's HB 2152 (2024) would have set up a plan for state use of generative AI: Office of Enterprise Technology Services risk assessments and procurement guidelines, an inventory of high-risk uses by each agency, employee training, a duty to tell people when AI mediates electronic communication, and chief information officer approval before adopting an automated decision system. It was referred to HET/LGO, CPC and FIN on January 24, 2024 and was not enacted.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None: the bill did not pass. It would have put AI risk assessment, disclosure and approval duties on state agencies, not private businesses.

Key provisions

  1. Would add a chapter requiring the Office of Enterprise Technology Services to report to the Legislature on state generative AI uses and risks, and the CIO and others to assess critical infrastructure risks
  2. Would require procurement guidelines built on the White House AI Bill of Rights blueprint and NIST AI Risk Management Framework, and guidelines for assessing impacts on vulnerable communities
  3. Each agency would maintain an inventory of high-risk generative AI uses; pilot projects would need prior risk and impact assessments
  4. Agencies using generative AI to communicate electronically would have to disclose it and post how to reach a human
  5. Before adopting an automated decision system an agency would need consultation, testing and chief information officer approval; high-risk systems would get ongoing OETS oversight
  6. No appropriation; would have taken effect upon approval

Latest legislative action

Jan 24, 2024. Referred to HET/LGO, CPC, FIN, referral sheet 2

Sponsors

NameRoleDistrict
D Sponsor HD-014
R Sponsor HD-043

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error