Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

HI HB1384: Relating To Artificial Intelligence.

Dead/Failed Hawaii · 2025 session

Last verified Oct 10, 2026 · official bill text

HB1384 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action Dec 8, 2025.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Hawaii's House Bill 1384 (2025), as amended in HD 1, would have created a Hawaii Artificial Intelligence Advisory Council within the Department of Accounting and General Services to recommend an action plan and advise the Legislature on AI. It would have required an interim report by December 31, 2026 and a final report and action plan by December 31, 2027, when the council would be repealed. It passed House second reading February 10, 2025, was carried over to 2026 and was not enacted. The text stated a July 1, 3000 effective date.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None: the bill was not enacted. If enacted, it would have created a state advisory council and reports and put no duties on businesses.

Key provisions

  1. Would have created the council, co-chaired by the Chief Information Officer and the Director of Finance, with state officials, legislative appointees and seven members invited by the Governor, meeting at least four times a year
  2. The action plan would have addressed capturing AI's economic benefits, responsible AI use to improve government efficiency, and ensuring AI vendors follow responsible-use standards
  3. Would have required an interim report by December 31, 2026 and a final report with an action plan by December 31, 2027, including a governance framework for state and county AI use
  4. Would have directed DAGS to establish permanent positions and funded it with an appropriation whose amount is left blank; no penalties
  5. Referred to ECD, FIN January 27, 2025; passed House second reading as HD 1 February 10, 2025; carried over to the 2026 session December 8, 2025, with no later action; stated effective July 1, 3000, repeal December 31, 2027

Latest legislative action

Dec 8, 2025. Carried over to 2026 Regular Session.

Sponsors (showing 5 of 16)

NameRoleDistrict
D Sponsor HD-046
D Sponsor HD-022
D Sponsor HD-035
D Sponsor HD-044
D Sponsor HD-017

Related and companion bills

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error