Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

IL HB 5044: CHATBOT PROVIDER-LIABILITY

In Committee Illinois

Last verified Oct 11, 2026 · official bill text

HB 5044 · where it stands

1 of 5 steps complete
  1. Introduced In committee
  2. Passed first chamber
  3. Passed both chambers
  4. Enacted
  5. Effective
What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Illinois's HB 5044 (104th General Assembly) would create the Chatbot Provider Liability Act. Chatbots would be deemed products for strict liability, and a chatbot provider would have a duty to ensure its chatbot does not injure a user and would be liable for injuries it causes a user even if it used all reasonable care or did not distribute the chatbot directly. Harmed users could sue for damages, injunctive relief and attorney's fees. Re-referred to Rules March 27, 2026.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

Not law. If enacted, chatbot providers would face strict liability for injuries their chatbots cause users, regardless of reasonable care.

Key provisions

  1. Would create the Chatbot Provider Liability Act (new Act)
  2. Chatbot means an AI, algorithmic or automated system generating text, audio, image or video that simulates interpersonal interaction; provider means anyone creating, distributing or making one available
  3. Chatbots would be deemed products for strict product liability purposes, and providers would have a duty to ensure use does not cause injury to a user
  4. Provider would be liable for injury to a user regardless of reasonable care in design and distribution, or of not distributing directly or having a contract with the user
  5. A harmed user could bring a civil action in State or federal court for actual damages, injunctive relief and reasonable attorney's fees and costs
  6. Assigned to Judiciary - Civil Committee March 4, 2026; Rule 19(a) re-referral to Rules Committee March 27, 2026

Latest legislative action

Mar 27, 2026. Rule 19(a) / Re-referred to Rules Committee

Sponsors

NameRole
Primary

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error