Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

IL HB1937: APA-SURVEY

In Committee Illinois · 2025–2026 session

Last verified Oct 27, 2026 · official bill text

HB1937 · where it stands

1 of 5 steps complete
  1. Introduced In committee
  2. Passed first chamber
  3. Passed both chambers
  4. Enacted
  5. Effective
What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Illinois' HB 1937 (Rep. Jed Davis) is a regulatory-reduction bill that mentions AI only as a permitted tool. As introduced, it would require the Auditor General to survey the Illinois Administrative Code for mandates and restrictions on the private sector and local governments and report within 2 years of the effective date, and would require State agencies to cut those mandates. The Auditor General, contractors, and agencies could use AI to do the counting. Introduced February 4, 2025; in Rules Committee.

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None unless enacted: the bill is pending in committee. If enacted, State agencies would have to repeal or amend rules; businesses would not owe new duties but their regulatory burden could change.

Key provisions

  1. Sec. 1-14.5 (State Auditing Act): the Auditor General would have to survey the Administrative Code for mandates and restrictions on private-sector entities and on local governments and taxing bodies, and report to the Governor and General Assembly within 2 years of the effective date
  2. The Auditor General could contract with a private entity, subject to appropriation and the Procurement Code, and the Auditor General or contractor could use artificial intelligence or similar software to scrutinize the Code
  3. Sec. 5-132 (Administrative Procedure Act): each State agency would have to file a follow-up report within 9 months of the Auditor General's report, and could use AI or similar software to assist its numerical count
  4. The Joint Committee on Administrative Rules would supervise, calculate each agency's share within 3 months, and report quarterly on implementation
  5. Each agency would have to, within 2 years of the follow-up reports, adopt, amend, or repeal rules to cut total mandates and restrictions to 250,000 or 80% of the Auditor General's count, whichever is lesser
  6. Status: filed January 29, 2025; first reading and referred to the House Rules Committee February 4, 2025

Latest legislative action

Feb 4, 2025. Referred to Rules Committee

Sponsors

NameRoleDistrict
R Sponsor HD-075

Topics and industries

Related topics

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error