Skip to content

Session Expired

Your session has expired. Please sign in again to continue where you left off.

Sign In Again

IL HB5228: AI USE IN GOVT CONTRACTS

Dead/Failed Illinois · 2023–2024 session

Last verified Oct 11, 2026 · official bill text

HB5228 · where it stands

This bill did not become law (dead/failed) · last action Jan 7, 2025.

What do these statuses mean?
Introduced
Filed in the legislature; may be waiting for a committee hearing.
Passed a chamber
Approved by one or both chambers; awaiting further action.
Enacted
Signed into law, or became law without a signature or over a veto.
Effective date
The date the law says it takes effect. Once it has passed, the page shows "Effective" and the date. A court order can still block a law; if we know of one, the summary says so.
Dead / vetoed
Vetoed, failed, or the session ended without action.

In one paragraph

Illinois's HB 5228 (103rd General Assembly) would have added Section 50-41 to the Illinois Procurement Code. A vendor contracting for government services, grants, or leases or purchases of software or hardware would have to disclose whether AI technology is, has been, or will be used in fulfilling the contract or in the goods or services purchased. It was not passed before the 103rd General Assembly ended (Session Sine Die, January 7, 2025).

Plain-English summary, written with AI assistance. The official text controls.

What it means for business

None: the bill died and never became law. It would have required State vendors to disclose AI use and allowed disqualification from State contracting for up to 2 years for non-compliance.

Key provisions

  1. Vendors would have to disclose whether AI technology is, has been, or will be used in fulfilling the contract or in the goods, technology or services purchased
  2. The disclosure would go to the chief procurement officer, the Department of Innovation and Technology and the General Assembly
  3. A vendor would have to give a new or updated disclosure if the role of AI changes during the contract or it plans to use AI when it had not originally planned to
  4. A State agency could, at its discretion, require detailed information on the technology's capacity, data sets and limitations on its use of AI
  5. The chief procurement officer could disqualify a vendor that fails to disclose or gives false or misleading information from State contracting for up to 2 years
  6. Filed February 8, 2024; first reading February 9, 2024; assigned to the Executive Committee March 12, 2024; re-referred to Rules April 5, 2024; Session Sine Die January 7, 2025

Latest legislative action

Jan 7, 2025. Session Sine Die

Sponsors

NameRoleDistrict
D Sponsor HD-021

Related and companion bills

Topics and industries

Affected industries

This page is general information, not legal advice. Summaries are AI-assisted and may contain errors; read the statute for the controlling text and talk to a lawyer about your situation. Full disclaimer · Report an error