Get emailed when this bill changes status, is amended, or advances.
Disclaimer: This page provides general informational summaries only and does not constitute legal advice. AI-generated content may contain errors. Always consult a qualified attorney for guidance specific to your situation.
Read full disclaimer →
Kentucky's HB626 seeks to regulate the use of biometric identifiers by requiring businesses to inform individuals and obtain consent before capturing their biometric data. It also sets forth storage and destruction requirements for such data. This bill will impact various sectors that utilize biometric technologies, including security and financial services.
Key Provisions
Defines 'biometric identifier'.
Prohibits capturing biometric identifiers without consent.
Requires reasonable storage and destruction of biometric data.
Exempts certain uses of biometric data.
Imposes civil penalties for non-compliance.
Enforcement by the Attorney General or Commonwealth's attorney.
Latest Legislative Action
to Committee on Committees (H)
Bill Sponsors (showing 5 of 6)
Name
Role
D. Elliott
Primary
D. Grossberg
Primary
J. Blanton
Primary
J. Branscum
Primary
J. Bray
Primary
S. Sharp
Primary
Compliance Checklist
Obtain consent before capturing biometric identifiers. Who: Businesses capturing biometric data. Penalty: Civil penalties enforced by the Attorney General.
Implement storage and destruction protocols for biometric data. Who: Businesses handling biometric identifiers. Penalty: Civil penalties for failure to comply.
HB626 establishes a new section in KRS Chapter 367 to define 'biometric identifier' and outlines the obligations of entities that capture such data for commercial purposes. It prohibits the capture of biometric identifiers without prior consent from the individual, thereby enhancing privacy protections. Additionally, the bill mandates that entities implement reasonable measures for the storage and destruction of biometric data to prevent unauthorized access and misuse. Non-compliance with these provisions could result in civil penalties enforced by the Attorney General or relevant Commonwealth's attorney. The bill also exempts certain uses of biometric data, such as voiceprint data retained by financial institutions and crash avoidance technology used by auto manufacturers, which may influence compliance strategies for businesses in these sectors. Overall, this legislation aligns with growing trends in biometric regulation across various states, reflecting increasing concerns over privacy and data security.
We use cookies for analytics to understand how visitors use this site. We also use essential cookies for site functionality.
See our Privacy Policy for details.